Who lives in Alhambra, California?
California · West · 82K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Alhambra compares
Where Alhambra lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Alhambra is a suburb of roughly 82,000 people on the western edge of the San Gabriel Valley, the so-called gateway where the 25-mile Asian commercial spine of Valley Boulevard begins before it runs east through Monterey Park and beyond. The defining fact about who lives here is the racial picture: White residents are about 13% of the population versus nearly 56% nationally, a flip that reflects decades of Chinese, Taiwanese, and Chinese-Vietnamese settlement layered over the city's older Mexican American base.
The age curve sits close to the country, with a mean near 49 and a slightly heavier share past 65, the signature of a settled homeowner town that earned its old nickname, the city of homes. This is a place people put down roots and stay, anchored by an economy of hospitals, the school district, and LA County public works rather than any single tower of office jobs.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On the Big Five, Alhambra reads close to the national baseline across the board. Openness sits a touch high and the tendency toward worry runs a couple points low, but none of these are the story here. The personality of the place is steady and even-keeled rather than tilted toward any one extreme.
How people decide and how much risk they will carry both track the country almost exactly. The real distance between Alhambra and the average lives in behavior, not temperament: this is a city that acts on its values around health, money, and consumption while keeping a calm, middle-of-the-road psychological profile.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Environmental concern runs well above average here. The share of residents who shrug off environmental issues is roughly 15% against about 27% nationally, and the active and activist end of the spectrum is correspondingly fuller. Ethical consumption follows the same arc: far fewer people say it never factors into what they buy, and the regular and strict tiers are both heavier than typical.
That points to a household that reads labels and weighs how a product was made, the kind of careful sourcing that fits a community where Valley Boulevard's markets and family-run shops reward people who know the difference between one supplier and another. Trust in big corporations sits about average, so these are discerning buyers rather than reflexively cynical ones.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
The platform mix here is close to the national pattern, with Facebook the largest single channel near a third of residents, Instagram and YouTube behind it, and YouTube running a little ahead of the country. Format preference is similarly broad, splitting evenly between short video, long video, and mixed content with no single winner.
Because nothing about the media diet is unusual, the lever is the message rather than the channel. Lead with substantiated health and value claims and the careful-sourcing story, and let longer video do the explaining where a quick clip would undersell it.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Saving here skews forward and deliberate. The aggressive-saver share is fuller than the country's while the no-savings group is thinner, and financial stress is lower than typical, with fewer households reporting the comfortable low-stress and fewer in real strain alike. The picture is one of disciplined money management rather than either ease or struggle.
That carries into protection: residents are notably less likely to carry only minimal insurance, favoring fuller coverage instead. Day-to-day buying motivation still leads with price and quality the way it does nationally, so the through-line is value with a long horizon rather than splurging.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is where Alhambra separates itself most clearly. Residents lean strongly toward preventive care, the catch-it-early posture of regular checkups and screening, at about 54% versus roughly 42% nationally. The flip side is that the indifferent corner of health consciousness has nearly emptied out, down to about 9% from 20% across the country, and the proactive middle has swelled.
One quieter countercurrent: people here tend to keep mental wellness to themselves. The private bucket runs meaningfully above average and the openly advocating share runs below, a reserve that fits a culture where managing health is something you do diligently but not loudly. Reach them with practical care, not public testimony.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Alhambra, California (race ethnicity, healthcare style, and environmental priority) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.