Who lives in Cedar Park, Texas
Texas · South · 76K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Cedar Park compares
Where Cedar Park lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Cedar Park is a suburb of about 76,344 people roughly 20 miles north of downtown Austin, the third-largest city in the metro and one of its fastest-growing. The economy runs on aerospace, defense, and tech employers like Firefly Aerospace, ETS-Lindgren, and National Oilwell Varco, plus the Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, which fills the streets with white-collar professional households rather than a transient or retiree crowd.
The loudest signal here is money discipline. Close to 48% of residents save aggressively, nearly twice the national share, and the non-saver group is tiny by comparison at about 11%. The age curve backs the profile: the 25-to-54 working-and-raising-kids bands are all heavier than the country's, while the 65-plus share runs well under, around 14% against roughly 21% nationally. This is a town of dual earners in their prime building years, not one winding down.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Cedar Park is close to the national baseline across the board, with only emotional steadiness tilting slightly calmer. The real distance is in posture toward risk and money, not temperament. Decision speed tracks the country closely, so these are people who do their homework but still pull the trigger.
Risk tolerance leans a little bolder than average, with fewer of the very cautious. Pair that with the early-adopter streak (roughly 48% are first in line for new technology, nearly double the norm) and you get households comfortable backing the newer or more ambitious option when the math holds up.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Trust in big institutions is the most telling values signal here, and it leans warmer than the country's: the trusting and neutral groups together cover most of Cedar Park, while outright cynics are scarce. That fits a prosperous, employer-anchored suburb where corporations are the neighbors' employers, not distant villains.
Environmental concern, ethical buying, and preference for local business all sit within a few points of national, so none of them is a defining cause here. Cedar Park will reward a brand that behaves well, but it is not screening every purchase through a values test.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
The television path is closing fast. Close to half of Cedar Park has cut the cord, so reaching them through traditional cable is a losing bet; streaming and connected-TV inventory is where their screens actually are. Facebook is the largest single platform at about a third of residents, consistent with a family suburb where neighborhood and school groups live.
Content format preference tracks national norms, so no single medium dominates; short video, long video, and text all find an audience. The leverage is in the channel, not the format: meet them on streaming and in the family-oriented corners of social, and skip the cable spend.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending is frequent and confident. About 32% buy something every week, far above the national share, and the rare-buyer group is thin. This is steady, comfortable consumption from households with the income to sustain it, not splurge-and-retreat behavior.
The financial backbone is the standout. Beyond the aggressive saving, only about 17% sit out of investing entirely against nearly 38% nationally, so most of Cedar Park has money working in the market. Excellent credit, held by roughly 46%, completes the picture of households that run their balance sheets like a business.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health here is an active project, not an afterthought. Close to 47% take a proactive approach and another 20% push into the obsessive end, while the indifferent group shrinks to under 6%. Premium wellness spending runs more than double the national rate, so these households put real dollars behind the intent. Comprehensive insurance is the norm, chosen by about 45%, which is the same plan-ahead instinct showing up in how they cover risk.
Sleep gets unusual respect: roughly 49% treat it as a high priority, well above the country. And the door to mental wellness is more open than most places, with advocates and openly engaged residents outnumbering those who keep it private. A brand can talk about rest and emotional health here without tiptoeing.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Cedar Park, Texas (savings behavior, credit health, and investment style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.