Who lives in College Station, Texas?
Texas · South · 120K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow College Station compares
Where College Station lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
College Station is a city of about 120,451 people in the Brazos Valley of east-central Texas, and its population pyramid barely resembles the country's. The mean age sits around 33, and the 18-to-24 band alone holds roughly 45% of residents against about 13% nationally, with every bracket past 35 thinning to less than half its usual weight. This is Texas A&M's gravity at work: a flagship campus that pulls in a fresh wave of students and young researchers each year and lets the middle-age and retirement years hollow out.
That age shape sets up the loudest financial signal in town. Half of residents save nothing on a regular basis, and over a third carry more debt than they can comfortably service, both far above typical, which is what an early-career, tuition-and-rent stage of life produces before incomes catch up.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here runs close to the national center on most axes, with two real exceptions. Openness sits a notch above average, the appetite for the new and untested that a campus town keeps refreshed, and emotional reactivity also reads a few points high, the churn of a population mid-transition through school, jobs, and first apartments rather than settled into routine.
Decision-making and risk appetite both track the country closely, leaning slightly toward quick choices and a touch more comfort with the high end of the risk scale. So the lever here is not caution or hesitation; it is that these residents will move when something reads as genuinely fresh.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Local-business loyalty is unusually soft for a place with a strong civic identity. Nearly a quarter of residents express no particular preference for buying local, well above the national share, which fits a transient student core that arrives without roots to a neighborhood butcher or hardware store and leaves before forming them. Environmental concern, by contrast, tilts active, with the engaged and activist tiers both running ahead of the country.
Skepticism toward big companies is sharper than usual, with the openly cynical group nearly twice the national rate and the reflexively trusting group thinned out. Ethical-consumption habits sit a bit above average too, so messaging that names a real practice beats vague corporate goodwill.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Traditional TV is largely gone. Close to 59% have cut the cord, nearly double the national share, and the place is almost saturated with podcasts and gaming, where the never-listen and never-play groups are roughly a third of their usual size. Reaching this audience means meeting them inside streaming, audio, and play rather than the living-room broadcast slot.
On social, Instagram and TikTok over-index while Facebook falls well below national weight, and short video is the favored format. Influencer recommendations also carry real weight, with the trusting group nearly double the country, so a credible voice inside a feed outperforms a polished brand spot.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending happens in steady, frequent doses rather than rare big swings. Monthly buyers are the largest group and the rare-purchaser tier is unusually thin, the rhythm of a population restocking apartments and managing recurring student costs. Price and quality drive choices at roughly the national split, so neither one is the wedge.
The wedge is the balance sheet. Brand loyalty is mercenary for a sizable plurality, meaning a better offer pulls them away with little friction, and insurance coverage runs minimal for nearly four in ten. With saving rare and leverage common, near-term price and a low barrier to switch matter more than long-game loyalty plays.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The standout in daily life is how openly people here treat mental health. The private, keep-it-to- yourself posture has nearly collapsed to a fraction of its national weight, while the open and advocate tiers together cover roughly two-thirds of residents, the kind of frankness a young, education-dense population normalizes early.
Physical health leans proactive rather than passive, with the actively-engaged group running ahead of the country and the indifferent group well below. Wellness framing that treats care as a normal part of an ambitious life lands cleanly here.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to College Station, Texas (streaming behavior, savings behavior, and debt attitude) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.