Who lives in Colorado Springs, Colorado?
Colorado · West · 480K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
Colorado Springs is a city of roughly 479,600 people spread across the high plains where the Rockies break upward into Pikes Peak. Its economy runs on uniformed and civilian work tied to Fort Carson, Peterson and Schriever Space Force bases, the Air Force Academy, and NORAD, alongside a deep bench of aerospace and defense contractors. The age profile skews slightly younger than the country, with a thicker 25-to-34 band at about 23%, the working-age engineers, soldiers, and families that orbit those installations.
The loudest signal here is how readily people take up new technology. Late adopters make up only about 13% of residents against roughly 28% nationally, a gap you would expect from a workforce steeped in satellite operations, missile defense, and engineering. New tools get adopted because the day job already assumes fluency with them.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Colorado Springs runs close to the national grain, with two quiet exceptions. Openness sits a few points high, a curiosity and willingness to try the unfamiliar that fits a transient, well-educated military and technical population. Conscientiousness leans up as well, the planning-and-follow-through temperament of people whose careers reward discipline.
How fast they decide and how much risk they will stomach both track the country closely. There is no built-in rush to commit and no special caution, so the lever is neither urgency nor heavy reassurance. It is giving a careful, capable audience enough to reason through.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision pace mirrors the country almost exactly, split between quick movers and deliberate weighers with no built-in hurry. Manufactured urgency and ticking-clock scarcity will read as noise to an audience this measured. Lead instead with substantiation they can verify, side-by-side proof and clear specifics, the kind of evidence an engineering-minded buyer expects before committing.
Risk appetite tilts faintly bold, with the high end running a little above national and the most timid buckets thinner than usual. Steady paychecks from base and federal work give part of this city room to take a calculated swing, so upside and a genuinely new angle can earn their place in the pitch. Just pair them with substance, because the slightly elevated worry baseline still wants a floor under the bet.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
A real appetite for the new and unfamiliar, the signature of a transient, well-schooled population that cycles through bases and technical jobs. Fresh approaches and novel features will get a fair hearing rather than a reflexive shrug, so lead with what is different instead of what is merely safe.
A planning-and-follow-through streak that fits careers built on discipline and precision. These are people who read the spec and finish what they start, so give them organized detail and clear next steps rather than vague promises.
Right at the national line. Social energy here is neither outsized nor reserved, so neither crowd-driven hype nor quiet one-to-one framing has a home-field advantage. Pick the channel by the message, not by assuming this city wants to be louder or softer than anyone else.
Essentially average. Residents extend trust and good faith about as readily as the rest of the country, no more guarded and no more deferential. Warm, straight framing works without needing to over-soften the ask.
A touch above national, a slightly higher baseline of worry that fits a community living with deployment cycles and transfers. Steadiness and reassurance carry a little extra weight, so calm, dependable framing lands better than anything that stokes anxiety.
What they care about
Loyalty to local shops is softer here than the national norm. The share who say independent, locally owned businesses strongly shape their choices runs to about 10%, well under the typical 16%, and the group who feel no pull toward local at all is larger. In a sprawling city built around bases and chain-dense commercial corridors, convenience and proximity outweigh a main-street allegiance.
Ethics and the environment register about average. A modest segment buys with values in mind and a slightly larger-than-usual slice considers themselves strict about it, but neither is the organizing principle of how this city shops.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Colorado Springs has cut the cord. Nearly half of residents stream rather than hold a cable subscription, and podcast listening is widespread, with the never-listen group well under the national level. Audio and on-demand video reach this audience where traditional broadcast no longer does.
On social platforms, Facebook still leads but more weakly than nationally, while Instagram and LinkedIn both punch above their weight, the latter fitting an engineering and defense-professional base. One caution: receptivity to advertising leans negative here, so earned credibility and useful content travel further than interruptive pitches.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Residents buy often. About 28% make a purchase weekly, well above the national share, and the rarely-shopping group is small. That cadence comes paired with a notable habit of sending things back: returning purchases frequently runs to roughly 41% here, far above the usual rate, the mark of buyers comfortable ordering, evaluating at home, and reversing the call without friction.
Saving behavior splits into two real camps. A solid quarter save aggressively while a similar quarter are non-savers, a spread consistent with steady military and federal paychecks on one side and younger, transient households still finding their footing on the other.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is where Colorado Springs separates itself. Close to half of residents take a proactive approach to their health, roughly fifteen points above the country, and the share who spend almost nothing on wellness is less than half the national figure. Living at altitude beneath a fourteen-thousand-foot peak laced with trails, with a culture that prizes the outdoors, makes fitness and preventive care ordinary rather than aspirational. High sleep priority follows the same pattern, treated as part of performance instead of an afterthought.
People here are also unusually willing to talk about mental health. Those who keep it strictly private are rare, and the open-and-advocate group is larger than typical, a posture that fits a military town increasingly candid about resilience and recovery.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Colorado Springs, Colorado (tech adoption, health consciousness, and streaming behavior) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.