Who lives in Concord, California
California · West · 125K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Concord compares
Where Concord lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Concord anchors central Contra Costa County, a mostly urban city of about 125,007 people sitting where BART meets the foothills of Mount Diablo. Its age curve tracks the country almost exactly, with a mean near 47 and a near-even gender split, so the story here is not who they are on paper but how they move through a store. The loudest signal is return behavior: roughly 48% send purchases back frequently, against about 27% nationally. That is the fingerprint of a buy-now-decide-later household, fluent in online ordering and comfortable treating the living room as the fitting room.
It pairs with a city that adopts early. About 48% reach for new technology ahead of the crowd, nearly double the national share, which fits a population plugged into the Bay Area's tech economy without living at its center, close enough to Oakland and San Francisco to follow the wave and far enough out to want the value Concord's lower cost of living offers.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Concord sits close to the national baseline across the board, and the honest read is that temperament is not where this city separates itself. Openness runs a touch higher, the one trait that nudges above the rest, consistent with the early-adopter streak. The other four hold near average.
Decision speed mirrors the country almost exactly, and risk appetite leans only modestly bolder than typical. The real distance shows up in behavior rather than disposition: how often they buy, how readily they return, how quickly they try the new thing. The mindset is steady, the shopping cart is busy.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Concord leans into conscience at the register. Only about 16% say ethics never factor into what they buy, half the national share, and the strict end of ethical consumption runs to roughly 13%, double typical. Environmental priority moves the same direction, with the unconcerned bucket thinning to about 16% and active and activist stances both above average.
One countercurrent is worth naming. Preference for local independents is softer here than nationally, with the strong-local bucket near 10% against 16%. In a city built around shopping centers, BART corridors, and big regional employers, loyalty attaches to values and convenience more than to the storefront down the street.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here runs through the open internet more than the cable box. About 49% have cut the cord, well above the national share, so streaming and on-demand placement land where broadcast spend leaks. On social, Instagram over-indexes and LinkedIn nearly doubles the national share, a tilt toward a professional, visually fluent audience, while Facebook runs lighter than the country.
One lever to skip: heavy social proof. About 43% need little outside validation before buying, so crowd-following and bestseller framing carry less weight than substance. Content format preference is flat, so the message matters more than the wrapper.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending in Concord is frequent and disciplined at the same time. About 40% buy something weekly, double the national rate, while the rare-buyer bucket shrinks to under 6%. The cart turns over fast, which is the demand side of that high return rate: a lot of orders means a lot of second-guessing.
Underneath the velocity sits real saving. Roughly 39% save aggressively, against about 26% nationally, and the non-saver share drops to around 17%. These are households that can afford to buy often and return freely because the budget has cushion, a profile that fits Concord's mix of upper-middle commuters and stable regional payrolls.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is a project these residents manage actively. About 51% take a proactive posture toward their wellbeing, half again the national rate, and the obsessive end runs higher too, while the indifferent share collapses to roughly 5%. This is a population that treats fitness and prevention as ongoing upkeep rather than crisis response.
The same candor extends to mental wellness. Only about 9% keep it strictly private, well under the national figure, and the open and advocate ends both sit above average. Concord talks about wellbeing out loud, which tracks with a Bay Area suburb where John Muir Health and similar institutions make health a visible part of local life.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Concord, California (return behavior, tech adoption, and purchase frequency) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.