Who lives in Des Moines?
Iowa · Midwest · 213K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Des Moines compares
Where Des Moines lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Des Moines is a city of about 213,164 people, the seat of Iowa government and the urban anchor of a metro built on insurance and financial services. Principal, Wells Fargo's mortgage operation, and a cluster of carriers keep the downtown towers and the four-mile skywalk full of salaried white-collar workers, and that steady-income base shapes almost everything else about the place.
The age curve runs a touch younger than the country, with a mean around 44 against 47 nationally and the 25-to-34 band swelling to roughly 24% as the East Village and downtown lofts pull in young professionals. The thinner end is the 65-plus group, near 15% where the nation sits above 20%. The loudest thing about these households is financial: aggressive savers are scarce here, about 16% versus 26% nationally, the kind of looseness you see when a region runs on dependable salaries rather than feast-or-famine work.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Des Moines sits close to the national center on most axes. Conscientiousness and extraversion barely move, openness and agreeableness land squarely on baseline, and the one real lift is a slightly higher tendency toward worry and emotional reactivity, about four points above the country.
How they make decisions is steady too. Most residents move at a quick or deliberate pace rather than on impulse, and appetite for risk tracks the nation almost exactly. This is a buy-when-ready crowd, neither jumpy nor frozen, and the small uptick in baseline tension means reassurance carries weight even when the purchase itself is routine.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
The sharpest value signal here is what residents do not do: support local businesses as a point of principle. Only about 8% feel strongly about buying local, half the national share, and the "no preference" group runs nearly double. In a metro dominated by big employers and national chains, a corner-store ethic never had much soil to grow in.
Environmental and ethical concern run a notch above the country. Roughly a quarter practice ethical consumption regularly and another third are environmentally active, a quiet, practical bent rather than a loud activist one. Skepticism toward big companies sits right at the national line, which makes sense in a town where the largest employers are also the most familiar neighbors.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook still leads but reaches a smaller share than nationally, around 26%, while Instagram over-indexes near 23% and TikTok runs a bit hot, a younger-skewing mix that tracks the downtown professional influx. Podcasts land especially well: only about a quarter listen to none, well under the national third, so audio is a live channel here.
Content preferences sit close to the national pattern, with short video the workhorse and a healthy text audience. The practical move is to pair an audio presence with the visual platforms rather than leaning on Facebook reach the way you might elsewhere.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending leans toward steady consumption over restraint. The frugal share is thin, about 21% against 29% nationally, and purchases skew frequent, with monthly and weekly buyers both running above the country and the "rare shopper" group shrunk. Price still drives the cart for a third of residents, but this is a population that spends without much hand-wringing.
The saving side is looser than the Midwestern stereotype suggests. Aggressive savers are rare and the sporadic group is the largest single bucket. Credit is part of the picture too: only about 17% hold excellent credit, below the national 25%, so households here carry more balances and lean on financing more than the steady incomes might imply.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is where this city tilts most clearly toward attentiveness. About 46% count as health-aware, well above the national 37%, and roughly half lean preventive in how they handle care, screenings and checkups ahead of crises rather than waiting for something to break. The deep-end "obsessive" group is small, so this reads as sensible maintenance, not wellness zealotry.
Residents are also unusually willing to talk about mental health. The guarded "keep it private" share is well below the country and the open and advocate groups are larger, which fits a white-collar workforce with good benefits and a culture that treats care as upkeep. The flip side of the city's general comfort: a fifth describe themselves as socially isolated, noticeably above the national rate, the loneliness that can settle into a spread-out, car-dependent capital.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Des Moines, Iowa (savings behavior, spending style, and health consciousness) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.