Who lives in Florissant, Missouri?
Missouri · Midwest · 52K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Florissant compares
Where Florissant lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Florissant began as Fleurissant, a blooming French colonial village near the Missouri and Mississippi confluence, and it still keeps an Old Town of 18th and 19th century buildings around the St. Ferdinand shrine. The postwar building boom turned it into the large bedroom community it is now, about 52,167 people on a mostly suburban grid of owner-occupied homes north of the St. Louis core.
The clearest shift over the last few decades is racial. About 42% of residents here are Black, roughly three times the national share, in a place that was overwhelmingly white within living memory. The age curve sits close to the country at large, with a mean near 47 and a slightly thinner slice of college-age adults, which fits a settled suburb of families and longtime homeowners rather than a town built around a campus or a transient workforce.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here reads close to the national center on every axis, with the gentlest lean toward steadiness. Conscientiousness sits a hair above average and emotional volatility a touch below, the temperament of households that have been paying a mortgage in the same zip code for years.
How they decide is where the texture shows. Roughly half pay deliberate attention to their own health, a posture that carries over into how they weigh most choices: aware, attentive, rarely rushed. Pair that with savings habits that run more sporadic than aggressive, and you get a careful audience that wants to feel informed before it commits, not one that responds to a clock.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values track close to the country on most fronts. Local-business loyalty, ethical sourcing, and the appetite to put environmental concern into action all land within a step or two of average, with a slightly larger group of residents who say they actively factor the environment into what they buy.
Trust in big companies tips a little sour. The fully trusting group is thinner here and the cynical edge is fuller, which in a north county suburb that has watched institutions come and go reads less as ideology than as earned wariness. Claims that can be checked will travel further than claims that ask to be taken on faith.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach skews to the platforms a settled suburban household already lives on. Facebook carries the widest share of attention, YouTube runs a little ahead of the country, and the smaller pull of LinkedIn marks a population working steady jobs more than building personal brands.
On format, short and long video both pull their weight and plain text lands a bit softer than average, so showing beats telling. Given the health attentiveness and the wariness toward big-company claims, content that demonstrates and substantiates will outperform a slogan.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending here is paced and watchful. Weekly buyers are notably scarcer than the national norm, with most residents settled into an occasional or monthly rhythm, the cadence of a household that plans a trip to the store rather than topping up on impulse.
The savings picture explains the restraint. Aggressive savers are well under the national share and the excellent-credit group is thinner too, while sporadic savers run high. Money tends to come in and get spent or set aside in fits, so value and durability matter more than novelty, and stretched-out financing or a clear payoff lands better than a splurge pitch.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The health signal is the loudest thing about Florissant. Around 51% of residents fall into the aware tier on their own wellbeing, the kind who read the label and keep up with checkups, a meaningfully larger share than the country carries. Far fewer tip into the obsessive end, so this is steady maintenance rather than fixation.
That awareness has a practical backbone. Residents skew toward holding adequate insurance coverage at a higher rate than average, so the health attentiveness comes with the means to act on it. On mental wellness the lean is a bit more guarded, with a slightly larger private group who would rather handle things quietly than talk them through openly.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Florissant, Missouri (health consciousness, race ethnicity, and insurance orientation) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.