Who lives in Fontana, California?
California · West · 209K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Fontana compares
Where Fontana lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Fontana is a city of about 209,279 in the heart of the Inland Empire, roughly 47 miles east of Los Angeles, where citrus groves and the wartime Kaiser steel mill gave way to the warehouses and freight yards strung along the I-10 and I-15. It runs young for its size, with a mean age near 43 against about 47 nationally and a thinner 65-plus layer, the profile of a working, family-raising population rather than a retirement destination.
The loudest demographic signal is identity: close to 64% of residents here are Hispanic, more than three times the national share, in a place where Spanish is heard as often as English and a large immigrant community anchors daily life. That majority-Latino, blue-collar character sits underneath nearly everything else in the profile.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
The single sharpest behavioral signal in Fontana is returns: about 47% of shoppers send purchases back frequently, close to double the national rate. In a town this close to the distribution centers, buying two sizes and keeping one is simply how shopping works, and it reframes the whole funnel as low-commitment by default.
On temperament the city is mostly close to baseline, with curiosity and risk appetite each running a few points high and a modest extra edge of stress sensitivity. People here will try the unfamiliar and move quickly, but they want the exit clearly marked before they commit.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Fontana cares more about how things are made than the country does. Only about 16% of residents say ethics never factor into what they buy, half the national share, and the engaged end (regular plus strict ethical buyers) runs well above normal. The same lean shows up on the environment, where far fewer here are unconcerned and the active and activist ranks are noticeably fuller, a posture that fits a community living downwind of the freight corridor it helps run.
Loyalty to local independents is the softer spot. Strong preference for small local shops runs below the national mark and more residents claim no particular pull toward them, which reads plainly in a landscape built around big-box retail and chain logistics.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Fontana has largely cut the cord: nearly half of residents are cord cutters, well above the national share, so reach lives in streaming and on the phone rather than traditional TV. Instagram and TikTok over-index while Facebook runs below the national norm, and short video is the format that pulls ahead, with long-form video lagging.
Two levers are unusually strong here. Roughly a third of residents trust influencer recommendations, far above national, and podcast listening reaches more people than it does nationally, so a credible local voice and an audio slot both punch above their weight in getting Fontana's attention.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Fontana buys often. About 35% of residents make a purchase weekly, well above the national share, and very few are rare shoppers, a steady cadence of small, frequent transactions rather than occasional big swings. Paired with the heavy return habit, this is a population comfortable cycling goods in and out at high frequency.
Saving is the quieter counterweight. Aggressive savers run a few points below national while the sporadic and regular middle is a bit heavier, the cash-flow rhythm of working households where money moves through quickly and the cushion stays thin. Price still anchors most decisions at about the usual rate.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture here is engaged without being extreme. Far fewer residents are indifferent to their health than nationally, the aware and proactive middle is fuller, and the truly obsessive fringe is thinner, the steady, practical wellness of households juggling shift schedules and kids.
Openness about mental health and stress sits close to the national norm, neither guarded nor crusading, so support framed as ordinary and useful will travel further here than anything that treats it as a cause to rally behind.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Fontana, California (return behavior, race ethnicity, and ethical consumption level) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.