Who lives in Fort Worth, Texas?
Texas · South · 925K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Fort Worth compares
Where Fort Worth lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Fort Worth is a nearly million-person city in North Texas, the place that built its name on cattle, rail, and the Stockyards and still answers to Cowtown and Panther City. It runs younger than the country, with a mean age around 44 and a thinner band of residents over 65, roughly 14% versus about a fifth nationally, the demographic shape of a boomtown pulling in working families faster than it ages.
The economy underneath is built on things that fly and things that ship: American Airlines is headquartered here, Lockheed Martin builds fighters on the west side, Bell makes aircraft, and logistics moves through the region's rail and highway spine. That hands-on, build-and-move base helps explain the standout trait of these households, an aversion to getting ahead of problems before they happen.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here sits close to the national baseline across the board, with small but real nudges toward curiosity, diligence, and a slightly hotter emotional register. The one place worth watching is that stress signal, consistent with younger households juggling growth-era costs.
The sharper story is behavioral rather than temperamental. They decide at a normal clip and carry a roughly average appetite for risk, but they are markedly comfortable reversing a choice after the fact, which loosens the stakes on any single decision and makes them quicker to give something a try.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Conscience shows up in the cart more than average here. Only about a fifth ignore ethical considerations entirely when they shop, well below the national share, and the ranks of regular and strict ethical buyers both run ahead of the country. Environmental concern follows the same gentle lean, with fewer people fully tuned out.
The wrinkle is loyalty to local. Strong preference for shopping small and local actually runs below the national rate, with more residents indifferent. In a sprawling, chain-heavy metro where convenience and price compete hard, the values translate into how a product is made rather than who is selling it down the street.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Fort Worth has cut the cord. Cord cutters meaningfully outnumber the national share, so reach runs through streaming rather than traditional cable. Podcasts are a real channel too, with far fewer non-listeners than the country at large, and short video pulls slightly ahead of long form.
On social, Instagram and TikTok punch above their national weight while Facebook sits below it, and these residents are unusually receptive to creators: trust in influencers runs about half again above average. A recommendation from a believable voice, delivered in a short clip or an audio feed, will travel further here than a polished broadcast spot.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
This is a frequent, high-turnover shopper. Weekly buyers outnumber the national share by a wide margin and rare shoppers are scarce, the rhythm of households restocking often rather than saving up for big occasional hauls. Price and quality drive most of those choices, in line with the rest of the country.
The signature financial move is returns: these residents send purchases back frequently, about half again as often as typical, treating the return window as part of the buying decision. Saving runs a little softer than average, with fewer aggressive savers, which fits a young population spending into a fast-rising cost of living.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The defining lifestyle trait is reactive healthcare. Almost nobody here takes a proactive posture toward their health, a share roughly nine times below the national rate, while awareness and as-needed attention carry the bulk of the population. This reads as a young, busy, work-first city that deals with health when it demands attention rather than scheduling around it.
Day-to-day health consciousness still tips slightly above average, with fewer people fully indifferent, so the gap is about planning horizon rather than indifference. Openness to discussing mental wellness sits right at the national norm, neither guarded nor especially vocal.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Fort Worth, Texas (healthcare style, return behavior, and podcast listening) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.