Who lives in Haverhill, Massachusetts
Massachusetts · Northeast · 67K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
Haverhill is a city of about 67,000 in Essex County, roughly 35 miles north of Boston and pressed right up against the New Hampshire border. It earned the name Queen Slipper City when it was making a tenth of the nation's shoes a century ago, and the factory-town pattern still shapes who lives here: dense downtown blocks and the Bradford neighborhood across the Merrimack, ringed by stretches that turn almost rural toward the county line. The age curve sits right on the national line, with a mean near 47 and a slightly heavier 55-to-64 band that reflects long-rooted families who never left.
The loudest demographic signal is faith. Roughly half of residents are Catholic, close to twice the national share, a direct inheritance of the Irish, French Canadian, Italian, and Polish workers who filled the shoe and comb shops and built a parish for each community. That Catholic majority has since been refreshed by a fast-growing Puerto Rican and Dominican population, which now makes up a sizable part of the city.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Temperament here tracks the country closely. Openness, extraversion, and how warm and cooperative people are all land within a point of the national reading, and the willingness to fret over what might go wrong sits only marginally higher. This is a steady, even-keeled population without a dramatic personality tilt to play to.
Where they do separate is conscientiousness, which runs a touch below average, and that fits the rest of their behavior better than any single trait. They are organized enough to plan ahead on the things that matter to them, health and coverage especially, without the rigid, by-the-book streak of a higher-discipline town. Decisions get made at a normal clip, neither impulsive nor stalled.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision speed mirrors the country almost exactly, with most choices made at a quick or deliberate pace and few people frozen in second-guessing. For an audience this steady, manufactured urgency and countdown scarcity will read as noise and may backfire. Lead instead with substantiation: show the proof, spell out the value, and let a fair, verifiable case carry the decision.
Risk appetite sits within a hair of the national spread, leaning neither bold nor especially cautious. Read against the rest of the profile, the preventive health habit and the avoidance of minimal coverage, this is a population that protects the downside before chasing upside. Guarantees, easy returns, and proof a thing will hold up earn more trust here than novelty or big-payoff framing.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Right at the national mark. Residents are about as ready to try something new as the rest of the country, no more drawn to novelty and no more wary of it. Fresh angles work, but they win on whether the idea is useful here, not on being the latest thing.
A shade below average. People here plan deliberately around what they care about, health and coverage above all, without the rigid, every-box-ticked streak of a higher-discipline place. Give them a clear, sensible next step rather than an elaborate system to follow.
Essentially the national reading. This is neither a notably outgoing crowd nor a withdrawn one, so messaging carries on its substance instead of social energy. Warm, plainspoken framing works as well as anywhere.
About a point under national. Residents extend good faith roughly as readily as the rest of the country, neither unusually trusting nor guarded. Straight, respectful framing lands; there is no defensive edge to talk around.
A touch above average. A mild tendency to weigh what could go wrong sits underneath the city's preventive instinct, the same caution that gets people to the checkup early and away from bare-bones coverage. Reassurance and a clear safety net land better than pressure or alarm.
What they care about
Concern for the environment runs a little warmer than the national baseline, mostly because the genuinely unconcerned share is thinner here; fewer residents wave the issue off entirely, even if few are activists about it. Views on whether big companies can be trusted sit squarely at the national middle, so neither blanket corporate cheerleading nor heavy populist suspicion will find much purchase.
Ethical-sourcing habits and the pull toward locally owned shops both land near typical, which suits a place where the corner parish, the family restaurant, and the downtown storefront have always coexisted with the big retail off Route 110. Quality edges up slightly as a buying motive while price still leads, the profile of households that will pay for something that lasts but want to see the value first.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the anchor platform, reaching close to a third of residents, with YouTube and a slightly above-average TikTok presence behind it and Instagram a bit lighter than the national pattern. This is a town you reach through the feed people already scroll, not the newest app.
Short video is the format that travels furthest, running ahead of the national share, while text, audio, and longer video all land near typical. Pair a quick visual hook with something a careful, value-checking buyer can read and verify before committing.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Finances read as stable and middle-of-the-road. Credit health tilts toward the good range a bit more than the national norm, the mark of households that pay on time and carry manageable balances rather than either pristine wealth or visible distress. Saving habits sit close to typical across the board, from regular savers to aggressive ones.
They shop at a steady cadence, slightly more monthly and weekly buying than average and fewer who rarely purchase at all, which points to consistent everyday consumption rather than big episodic splurges. Price leads their decisions with quality close behind, so the winning pitch shows the cost is fair and the thing will hold up.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is the through-line of the whole city. Residents lean preventive about their health, about 55% versus roughly 42% nationally, the single most distinctive thing about them. They book the checkup, run the screening, and treat care as maintenance rather than repair. Health awareness reads a notch above average in the same direction, and the obsessive, over-tracking end of the spectrum is unusually thin.
The same posture shows up in coverage and rest. Residents are markedly less likely to carry only minimal or bare-bones insurance, a habit that fits a region long built on union shops and stable benefits, and now on commuters holding steady Boston-area jobs. They are also more open about mental wellness than the country at large, with fewer people keeping it strictly private, and they keep sleep on a moderate, regular footing.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Haverhill, Massachusetts (healthcare style, religion, and insurance orientation) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.