Who lives in Lawrence, Kansas
Kansas · Midwest · 95K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Lawrence compares
Where Lawrence lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Lawrence is a city of about 95,000 in northeastern Kansas, built by anti-slavery New England settlers in 1854 and shaped ever since by the University of Kansas that sits on Mount Oread above downtown. The clearest mark of that university is who lives here: the 18-to-24 band holds close to 30% of adults against roughly 13% nationally, and the mean age sits near 40 even with so many students pulling it down. The middle-age and retirement years thin out to match.
That young, heavily-credentialed base sets the tone for almost everything else. Cord cutting is the loudest signal of all, with about 46% having left traditional cable behind, and it travels with a population fluent enough in technology that outright laggards are scarce, roughly 17% versus 28% nationally. This is a Massachusetts Street crowd of students, faculty, hospital and Hallmark workers who treat a streaming subscription and a new app as defaults rather than decisions.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality these residents sit close to the national center. Curiosity, sociability, warmth and emotional steadiness all land within a point or two of average, so there is no dramatic temperament here to play to. Where they do part from the norm is in posture toward the new: an openness to fresh ideas paired with low tech caution that fits a campus town comfortable trying things before they are proven.
Decision-making runs at a normal clip and risk appetite tilts only slightly bold, so the real lever is novelty rather than nerve. They will give an unfamiliar product a look on the strength of being interesting and current, not because they crave a gamble.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Environmental concern is a genuine differentiator. Only about 16% are unconcerned versus 27% nationally, and the activist end runs above average, which squares with a town that fills its East Lawrence bungalows with sustainable retrofits and yard art. Ethical buying follows the same line: fewer residents opt out entirely, with the regular and occasional shoppers carrying more weight than they do nationally.
Preference for local business and skepticism of big companies both track the national middle, so neither is a hook on its own. The values worth leading with are the green ones, which here read as settled habit rather than statement.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach starts with the screen, not the set. With cable largely gone, streaming and on-demand video are where attention lives, and podcasts land well given only about 23% listen to none against a third nationally. Gaming is also broad, with non-players down to roughly 18%, so in-game and audio channels both pull weight.
On social, TikTok punches above its national share and Reddit runs ahead too, both fitting a young, online town, while Facebook still carries the largest single platform. Short video is the workhorse format. Lead with audio and short clips delivered through streaming and podcast feeds rather than anything that assumes a broadcast lineup.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
For all the education, this is not a saving town. About 38% are non-savers, well above the national 27%, and the share carrying more debt than they can comfortably handle runs to roughly 23%, about 1.6 times typical. A student-heavy, early-career population on entry-level and public-sector pay explains the thin cushion better than any lack of discipline does.
Buying happens at a steady monthly rhythm and price leads motivation, as it does most places. The practical read is that big upfront commitments and stretch purchases will struggle here; flexible terms and lower entry points meet people where their cash flow actually is.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health-wise this is a proactive town. The share who shrug off their own wellbeing is well below average at about 13%, and the proactive bucket climbs to roughly 41%, the kind of profile you get where the river trails, the campus rec culture and an active young population overlap.
They are also unusually candid about mental health. Only about a tenth keep it strictly private against nearly a fifth nationally, and the open and advocate ends both run high. Wellness messaging can be direct here and address the mind as plainly as the body without tripping any stigma.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Lawrence, Kansas (streaming behavior, tech adoption, and environmental priority) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.