Who lives in Mobile, Alabama?
Alabama · South · 186K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Mobile compares
Where Mobile lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Mobile is a city of about 186,316 on the upper edge of Mobile Bay, Alabama's only deepwater seaport and one of the oldest French and Spanish colonial settlements on the Gulf Coast. It is majority Black, with roughly 53% of residents Black against about 14% nationally, the loudest demographic signal on the map. Faith runs deep alongside it: close to 59% identify as Evangelical, more than double the national share, a Protestant overlay on a city that also gave the country its first Mardi Gras out of French Catholic tradition.
The age curve and gender split sit close to national, with a slight tilt female (about 54%) and a median age near 48. What separates this audience is financial rather than demographic: a majority hold no investments and a large share keep no savings, the texture of a working port-and-shipyard economy where income arrives and is spent rather than parked.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here sits close to the national baseline, with two small lifts worth naming. Conscientiousness runs a few points high, a planning-and-follow-through bent that fits a workforce built around Austal's shipyards, the Airbus assembly line, and port logistics. Worry sits a touch above average too, in step with a coast that schedules its summers around hurricane season and households with thin financial margins.
Decisions get weighed rather than rushed, leaning a little more deliberate than the country, and risk appetite is cautious. The instinct is to protect what is in hand rather than reach for upside, which colors everything from a major purchase to whether a household trusts a new product at all.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
The sharpest value signal is wariness of corporations. Outright cynicism toward big companies runs well above national and genuine trust runs below, a guarded posture toward brands that have to earn their place. Stated environmental and ethical-consumption priorities sit close to the national middle, so green or cause-led positioning is fine as table stakes but rarely the thing that closes.
Notably, the pull toward shopping local is softer here than nationally, with the strong-preference end thinner than average. In a place this proud of its own history that reads less as indifference and more as a price-first reality: when budgets are tight, the cheaper option wins over the homegrown one.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here is mainstream and unflashy. Facebook is the workhorse platform, Instagram slightly over national, and the early-adopter share runs well below average, so this is not an audience that rewards being first onto the newest app. Meet them where they already are rather than chasing the bleeding edge.
Format preference splits close to national across short video, text, and mixed media, with no single channel carrying the room. Plain, concrete creative on Facebook and Instagram, paired with the proof and guarantees a cautious buyer wants, will travel further than polished novelty.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
This is the heart of the profile. About 54% of residents are non-investors and roughly 43% save nothing in a typical month, both far above national, while the aggressive-saver end is thin. Credit health is softer than average, with excellent scores uncommon and a clear over-leveraged segment near 24%, well above the national rate. Money here is largely a cash-flow story, not a balance-sheet one.
Buying motivation is led by price, and purchases skew occasional rather than frequent or impulsive. Financing, layaway, and low-monthly framing speak to real constraints, and any pitch built on investment discipline or long-horizon returns will miss most of this audience entirely.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture is aware more than active. A large share of residents know they should be paying attention to their health, but the proactive and committed end runs below national, and the share treating sleep as a real priority is lower too. That fits shift work and a humid, hot climate where rest and routine bend around the job.
Openness to mental-wellness conversation tracks the national middle, neither closed off nor especially forward about it. Practical, low-friction health framing fits better than aspirational wellness; meet them at awareness and make the next step easy rather than demanding a lifestyle overhaul.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Mobile, Alabama (investment style, savings behavior, and race ethnicity) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.