Who lives in New Bedford, Massachusetts?
Massachusetts · Northeast · 101K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow New Bedford compares
Where New Bedford lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
New Bedford is a city of about 100,620 on the Massachusetts South Coast, the 19th-century whaling capital of the world that reinvented itself as the highest-grossing fishing port in the United States, built on scallops and a deep Portuguese-American workforce with Azorean and Cape Verdean roots. The age curve and gender split sit right at the national shape, so the story is not about who is young or old here. It is about how connected people feel: roughly 27% register as socially isolated, close to twice the national rate, the single loudest signal in the city and a pattern that fits a working-class place where life runs through family, parish, and neighborhood rather than wide public networks.
That inwardness carries into commerce. More than a fifth of residents claim no particular pull toward local businesses at all, better than double the national share, and a strong preference for local shops is comparatively rare. For a city this proud of its waterfront identity, the loyalty is to people and to home, less to storefronts as such.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality and decision-making, New Bedford mostly sits where the country sits. Decision speed and risk appetite both hug the national middle, and four of the five big temperament traits land within a point or two of average. The one that moves is a tilt toward worry, a few points above the norm, which reads naturally in an economy where the next season is never promised and the offshore wind buildout that was supposed to be the future now sits under a cloud.
The practical read is that this is a steady, even-keeled audience that does not rush and does not gamble lightly. They respond to calm and substance, and they tense up at anything that feels like pressure or hype.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
The value that stands out is a thin attachment to local brands, with over a fifth of residents feeling no particular loyalty to local businesses and few holding a strong one. Brand loyalty in general runs mercenary here, with about a third willing to switch for a better deal, so attachment has to be re-earned at each purchase rather than assumed.
On the softer values, New Bedford holds near the national line. Environmental priority and ethical-consumption habits both sit close to average, and trust in big companies is roughly typical, leaning a touch skeptical. These are not the levers that move this city.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach is built for a quieter, local audience. Facebook is the anchor platform though it indexes a touch below the national norm, Instagram runs slightly above, and the rest of the field tracks the country. Short video over-indexes modestly while long video runs lighter, so brief, plain clips will travel further than anything that demands a long sit.
The thread tying it together is the city's inward social shape: messages move best through family, neighborhood, and the people residents already trust, so word of mouth and community channels do more work here than broad, high-volume blasts.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money is handled carefully and close to the edge. Aggressive saving is roughly half as common as it is nationally, most households are non-savers or sporadic ones, and financial strain sits high enough that a comfortable, low-stress budget is the exception. Excellent credit is comparatively rare and non-investing is the norm, so the picture is one of working households managing month to month rather than building a cushion.
Purchases lean on price as the first motivation, a little above the national pull, and buying frequency is ordinary. The takeaway is value-first: a clear price, a real reason to trust it, and no commitment they cannot walk back.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture is where the lifestyle picture sharpens. Residents skew toward preventive care, with around 54% taking the see-the-doctor-before-it-breaks approach, well above the national share, a sensible instinct in a city anchored by healthcare employment and a hard-working population that cannot afford to be sidelined. At the same time, the obsessive, optimize-everything end of health consciousness is almost absent, and most people land in the merely aware middle.
On mental wellness the city is unusually willing to talk. The guarded, keep-it-private posture runs well below the national rate, and openness and advocacy run above it, a quieter strength worth meeting with directness rather than stigma.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to New Bedford, Massachusetts (community connection, savings behavior, and local business preference) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.