Who lives in Oklahoma City?
Oklahoma · South · 681K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Oklahoma City compares
Where Oklahoma City lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Oklahoma City is the sprawling, mostly flat state capital of about 681,000 people, an energy and aerospace hub anchored by Devon, the oil and gas trade, and Tinker Air Force Base, with cattle heritage still alive in the Stockyards. The loudest thing about who lives here is faith: roughly 52% identify as Evangelical, close to twice the national rate, in a metro that famously has one of the highest counts of churches per capita and is home to the megachurch Life.Church. That is the single fact a Census table cannot give you, and it colors much of the rest.
The age curve is unremarkable, skewing a touch younger than the country with a slightly thinner 65-and-up band, and the gender split is even. The story is the culture, not the demographics: a working-and-faith city where church membership often defines the social map more than neighborhood does.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality these residents sit near the national baseline, with two real exceptions. They run a little higher on planning and follow-through, the steadiness of households that keep their commitments, and noticeably higher on worry and stress sensitivity, a sign of real financial and health pressure beneath an even-keeled surface.
Decision-making is deliberate rather than impulsive, and risk appetite holds near the middle. Put together, this is an audience that thinks before it commits and wants to feel safe doing so, so proof and reassurance move them where urgency does not.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Loyalty to local independents is softer here than the country at large, with only about 9% holding a strong preference for shopping local. In a city built on national energy firms, big-box corridors, and a base economy, the corner-store loyalty that smaller towns lean on is not the lever. Convenience and a trusted brand name carry the day.
Ethical and environmental concerns track close to the national norm without standing out, and skepticism of big companies sits about average. These are pragmatic shoppers who weigh price and quality first and leave the cause-driven framing as a quiet plus rather than a headline.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Audio is the open door. The share of residents who listen to no podcasts at all runs well under national, a reachability that lines up neatly with a faith culture of sermons, devotionals, and talk, and with the YouVersion-and-Life.Church audio habit rooted in this metro. Pair that with a strong cord-cutting streak, around 40% having dropped traditional cable, and the path in is on-demand and on headphones.
On social, Facebook remains the anchor though slightly below national, with Instagram overperforming and short video the format that travels furthest. Reach them through the channels and congregational networks they already trust, in audio and short clips rather than long broadcast formats.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending here is steadier and a bit more frequent than the country, with weekly and monthly buyers outnumbering the rare-purchase crowd and outright frugality less common, only about 22% versus roughly 29% nationally. One quirk stands out: returns run high, with about 34% sending things back frequently, so generous, friction-free return policies are not a nicety but an expectation.
The flip side of regular spending is a thinner savings habit, with aggressive savers running below national. Price still leads what motivates a purchase, so value framing backed by an easy return safety net is the combination that converts.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The clearest lifestyle signal is how people handle their health: only about 7% take a proactive, get-ahead-of-it approach, well under half the national share. Far more sit in an aware-but-reactive posture, attending to health when something flares rather than chasing prevention, which fits a region where access and habit both lean toward treating problems as they come.
Openness about mental health runs a bit warmer than you might expect for the Bible Belt, with the private, keep-it-to-yourself share noticeably below national and more people willing to talk things through. Framing wellness as steady stewardship of body and family, rather than self-optimization, fits the grain here.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (religion, healthcare style, and podcast listening) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.