Who lives in Pine Hills, Florida?
Florida · South · 83K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Pine Hills compares
Where Pine Hills lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Pine Hills is an unincorporated community of about 83,221 people in Orange County, just west of Orlando, built out in the 1950s as one of the metro's first suburbs and now one of its most diverse. Roughly 69% of residents are Black, about five times the national share, and the texture is distinctly Caribbean: Haitian families predominate, with Jamaican and other West Indian households alongside them, visible in the Creole signage, the patty shops, and the immigration offices clustered along Pine Hills Road.
The age curve sits a touch younger than the country, with a mean near 45 and slightly thinner representation past 65. This is a place of working families rather than retirees, where the dominant jobs sit in food service, retail, health care support, and manual trades, and where the household economy runs closer to the bone than the suburban label suggests.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
The Big Five personality profile here tracks the national mean almost exactly, with no single trait moving more than a point in either direction. Where the country sits, Pine Hills sits too, so the personality signature is not where this audience separates from the pack.
Decision-making is similarly centered. People here weigh purchases at roughly the typical pace and carry a typical appetite for risk, leaning neither sharply cautious nor unusually bold. The real distance between Pine Hills and the rest of the country shows up not in temperament but in the financial and health behaviors that flow from a tight household budget.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Trust in big institutions runs short. Only about 8% of residents extend ready trust to large corporations while close to 19% land in the openly cynical camp, well above the national rate, a wariness that fits a community long talked about by outsiders rather than listened to. Claims from a national brand start from a deficit and have to be earned in concrete terms.
On other values the community sits near the middle. Environmental concern, ethical buying, and a preference for local businesses all land close to typical, so messaging built on green credentials or buy-local appeals will neither carry nor sink a pitch here on its own.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here runs through Facebook first, the platform about 30% name as their primary, with Instagram second and a meaningful slice naming no main platform at all. YouTube holds a steady minority. The channel mix looks ordinary, so the work is in the message rather than the medium.
Format preference leans toward short video, a little above the national tilt, with mixed and long-form video close behind. Quick, visual, plainly useful content fits how this audience actually watches, and given the short supply of corporate trust, concrete proof carries further than polish.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money habits trace the same tight-margin story. Close to 47% are non-savers and about 58% hold no investments, both well above national levels, while roughly 36% sit low on financial literacy. This is a cash-flow economy where the month is managed paycheck to paycheck rather than through a portfolio.
Buying skews toward the practical. Price leads the reasons people choose what they choose, and the rhythm tilts occasional rather than weekly, the pattern of households that buy when there is room to and hold off when there is not. Credit products and investing platforms have to clear a high bar of plain usefulness to land.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health and wellness is where Pine Hills moves the most. About 46% of residents are indifferent to health routines, more than double the national figure, and only around 18% lean preventive in how they handle care, meaning most reach for a doctor when something breaks rather than to stay ahead of it. Roughly 43% carry minimal insurance, which closes the loop: care tends to be reactive because the coverage and the cushion for anything else are thin.
Sleep gets shortchanged too, with about 53% placing it low on their list, the loudest single signal in the community and a familiar mark of shift work and second jobs. On mental wellness, roughly 34% keep it strictly private, a reticence that runs deeper than the national norm and often reflects cultural and faith traditions where struggles are handled at home or in church.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Pine Hills, Florida (sleep priority, health consciousness, and healthcare style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.