Who lives in Plantation, Florida?
Florida · South · 93K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Plantation compares
Where Plantation lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Plantation is a roughly 93,000-person suburb west of Fort Lauderdale, a planned, tree-lined grid that has worn the Tree City USA label for more than three decades and grew up around the failed Everglades Plantation Company that gave it its name. The age curve leans mature: the median sits around 50, the 65-and-over share is close to a quarter of adults at about 25%, and the youngest band thins out, with 18-to-24-year-olds near 8% against a higher national figure. This is a place people settle into rather than pass through.
That permanence shapes the household. These are established professionals and families, many anchored to the employers clustered along the Midtown corridor and Broward Boulevard, from Motorola Solutions and TradeStation to Aetna and Magic Leap. The result is a stable, owner- occupied base with the time horizon and means to plan well ahead, which is exactly where the sharpest signals show up.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality, Plantation reads close to the national baseline across the board. Openness and extraversion sit right at the line, conscientiousness and agreeableness tick a point above, and the one real drift is a slightly calmer disposition, the even keel of a settled, low-churn suburb. None of this is the story; the story is behavioral.
Decision-making moves at an unhurried, considered pace, and risk appetite leans modestly toward calculated bets rather than guarantees. Read alongside how these households handle money and health, the picture is people who weigh a choice, then commit to it for the long haul.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values here tilt gently toward conscience without turning into a cause. Roughly 73% engage in some ethical consumption versus a lower national share, and active environmental concern runs a touch ahead too, the practical posture you would expect from a community that has built its identity around its tree canopy and wildlife habitat rather than around activism.
Loyalty to local merchants is real but measured: about 21% hold a strong preference for local business and another 45% a moderate one, leaving a majority who will choose the neighborhood option when it competes. Trust in big companies sits near the national norm, so these are pragmatic buyers rather than reflexive skeptics.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Media reach tracks the national pattern, with one tilt worth using. Facebook is the leading platform at roughly 33%, slightly ahead of the country and a fit for an older-skewing, family-rooted suburb, while Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube fill in behind at typical shares.
Format appetite is balanced between short and long video with a solid text and audio audience, so there is no single channel that carries everything. The opening that works is substance over spectacle, reaching a careful, technology-comfortable household that adopts new tools readily but decides on its own terms.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Plantation households save like people who intend to stay. Roughly 34% save aggressively and only about 18% are non-savers, far below the national figure, so the typical resident is building a cushion rather than living to the edge of a paycheck. Investing follows: the share sitting out of the market entirely runs near 29%, below the national rate, and insurance is rarely treated as an afterthought, with minimal coverage down around 13%.
What they buy on is ordinary. Price and quality drive most purchases at about the national split, with no strong status or experience skew. The distinctive thread is the framing around the purchase, the steady, protect-the-downside discipline, more than what fills the cart.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is the loudest part of the profile. About 46% of residents manage their health proactively, well above the national rate, and the indifferent share collapses to roughly 8%. The same instinct shows in care: around 52% lean preventive, getting ahead of problems instead of waiting for them, and only about 15% treat sleep as a low priority.
The wellness habit carries into spending and openness alike. Just 19% keep wellness outlays minimal, meaning most are willing to pay for staying well, and attitudes toward mental health sit comfortably near the mainstream. Health is treated as maintenance on something worth keeping, consistent with a long-settled, mature population.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Plantation, Florida (health consciousness, healthcare style, and tech adoption) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.