Who lives in Roanoke, Virginia
Virginia · South · 99K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Roanoke compares
Where Roanoke lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Roanoke is a city of about 99,213 people set in the Roanoke Valley between ridges of the Blue Ridge, the largest city in southwest Virginia and the rail town the Norfolk and Western built before Carilion Clinic and the Virginia Tech Carilion medical and biomedical campus gave it a second economic engine. The age curve sits a little older than the country, with a mean near 48.6 and the 25-to-34 band slightly fuller than national, the shape of a place that holds onto working-age residents rather than churning them through.
The loudest thing about this audience is how it meets anything new. Only about 15% are early adopters of technology, against more than a quarter nationally, a gap that says the default here is to let a product prove itself on someone else's dollar first. That caution is not poverty of curiosity so much as a settled, show-me practicality, and it threads through the rest of the profile.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Decision-making runs almost exactly to the national pattern, weighted toward deliberate and quick choices with few people stuck in second-guessing. Personality is steady too: openness, extraversion, and conscientiousness all sit within a point of baseline, and emotional volatility runs a touch below, so this is a even-keeled crowd rather than a reactive one.
Where the thinking actually bends is toward the conservative end of risk. The very-high risk-takers are thinner here and the very-low end is fuller, which tracks with a household economy that does not leave much room to absorb a bad bet. The mind that waits for technology to prove itself is the same one that wants a downside it can see before it commits.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
On values, Roanoke holds close to the middle of the country. Environmental concern, ethical buying, and a preference for local business all sit within a couple of points of national, so neither a hard green pitch nor a heavy buy-local appeal will move people more than it would anywhere else.
Trust in big companies is ordinary as well, with most residents landing in the neutral-to-skeptical middle and only a small slice fully cynical. Claims are taken at face value here until they aren't, which means the burden is on showing the thing works rather than overcoming a wall of suspicion.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
The media picture is close to national with one clear center of gravity: Facebook, which carries about a third of primary social attention here, more than any other platform and the obvious anchor for local reach. A meaningful slice, near 18%, names no primary platform at all, so radio, local news, and out-of-home still matter for catching the people who are not scrolling.
On format, short video and a mix of media edge ahead, with text and long video a step behind. Keep the message plain and proof-forward rather than novel, and lead with the Facebook-and-local combination that reaches both the connected and the offline ends of this valley.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money habits are the second-loudest part of the picture, and they all point the same direction. Aggressive saving is rare at about 15% against a quarter nationally, non-savers are the largest group, and excellent credit shows up in only about one in seven residents. Roughly half are non-investors, a third more than the country, so wealth here is held in a paycheck and a home rather than in the market.
Spending itself is occasional rather than habitual. Weekly buyers are thin at about 10% and the typical rhythm is occasional-to-monthly, with price and quality driving the choice far more than status or experience. Frequent product returns are also uncommon, the mark of buyers who decide carefully up front and keep what they get.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
For a city anchored by one of Virginia's largest health systems, the personal health posture leans reactive. Only about 22% manage their health proactively against a third nationally, the indifferent and merely-aware groups swell to fill the gap, and reactive-only is the dominant healthcare style at roughly 41%. People here tend to deal with a problem once it shows up rather than head it off.
Sleep gets the same treatment: only about a fifth rank it a high priority, well under national, the rest of the daily load winning out over rest. Openness about mental wellness sits modestly below average, with more residents keeping it private and fewer treating it as something to advocate for, so wellness messaging works better framed as quiet, practical self-maintenance than as a cause.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Roanoke, Virginia (tech adoption, health consciousness, and investment style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.