Who lives in Scranton, Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania · Northeast · 76K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
Scranton is a city of about 76,119 in the Lackawanna Valley, the seat of Pennsylvania's old anthracite coal country and the place that wired up some of the country's first electric streetcars. The mines and rail yards that built it are long gone, and the work now centers on hospitals, the University of Scranton, and the retail and service jobs that fill in around them. The age curve sits close to the national shape, a touch younger at the bottom where the college bands push the 18-to-24 share to roughly 17% against about 13% nationally, and steady through the older years.
The loudest thing about these households is financial. About 56% are non-investors, half again the national share, and roughly 43% save nothing in a typical month. Faith is the other defining mark: around 54% identify as Catholic, close to double the national rate, the residue of Irish, Italian, and Polish parishes that organized whole neighborhoods around the church when the mines were running.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality these residents read close to the national middle. Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness all land within a point or two of baseline, so there is no exotic temperament to design around. The one small lift is on the worry-and-strain side, a few points above average, which tracks with a place that has absorbed decades of economic contraction and learned to keep a wary eye on the next bill.
Decision speed and risk appetite both run near the national pattern, with risk leaning slightly cautious at the top end. The thin slice of true risk-takers is about half the usual size, which fits a household economy with little cushion to absorb a bad bet.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision-making tracks the national pattern closely, with a slight tilt toward the deliberate over the impulsive. The flatness rules out manufactured urgency: countdown timers and last-chance scarcity will mostly bounce off a budget-minded audience that has learned to wait. Lead instead with substantiation, plain proof the thing is worth the money, and give them room to decide on their own clock.
Risk appetite leans modestly cautious, with the true risk-takers running about half the national share and the wary end sitting above it. That fits a working-class household economy with thin savings and little room to absorb a wrong call, the same reality behind the high non-saver and non-investor numbers. Guarantees, warranties, and easy returns carry more weight here than upside, novelty, or big-payoff framing.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
A hair under the national line, which means curiosity about the new is roughly average and there is no special hunger for novelty to lean on. These are people comfortable with the familiar and proven. Lead with how a thing works and why it lasts rather than how fresh or cutting-edge it is.
Effectively at the national mark. Diligence and follow-through here look like everyone else's, so there is no extra reliability instinct to flatter or fight. Clear, organized, dependable messaging fits without needing to push the discipline angle.
Right at baseline. Sociability runs about average, so neither a high-energy crowd play nor a quiet, introspective pitch has an edge. Match the tone to the channel and let the offer carry the message.
A whisker below national, which is no real distance. Willingness to extend trust and give a fair hearing holds up as well here as anywhere. Warmth and good-faith framing earn their keep, especially from a business that comes across as straight with people.
A few points above the national line, the modest extra wariness of a place that has weathered long economic decline. These households watch for what could go wrong and feel the strain of a tight budget. Reassurance, steadiness, and removing the sense of risk land better than excitement or hustle.
What they care about
Values here sit close to the national center. Preference for local business, ethical-consumption habits, and environmental concern all land within a few points of average, so neither a strong buy-local identity nor a green-conscience identity is doing much work. There is a faint lean toward corporate wariness, with the most cynical-of-big-business slice running a little above average, which reads naturally in a Rust Belt town that watched its anchor industries pull out.
The practical read is that appeals built on civic virtue or sustainability will not carry much weight on their own. Price, reliability, and a sense that a business is straight with people matter more than mission language.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here is ordinary and that is the useful finding. Platform use mirrors the national mix, with Facebook the workhorse at about a third of residents and the rest spread across Instagram, YouTube, and a thinner TikTok and X presence. Content appetite splits evenly between short video, longer video, and mixed formats with no strong tilt.
Facebook is the dependable backbone for a Catholic, multi-generational, locally rooted audience. Lean on it for community reach and treat the other channels as supporting rather than central.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
This is a paycheck-to-paycheck spending culture. Beyond the roughly 43% who save nothing and the 56% who don't invest, weekly shopping is rare, with only about 8% buying on a weekly cadence against nearly 20% nationally, so purchasing clusters into occasional, planned trips. Excellent credit is about half as common as nationally, near 13%, and frequent returners are well below average, the mark of careful, deliberate buys rather than easy churn.
Price leads motivation, edging out quality. These are households that decide slowly, buy occasionally, and expect the purchase to hold up, because there is little margin to replace it.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture skews toward awareness without much intensity. The share that treats wellness as a central project is small, roughly 4% in the most devoted bracket against about 9% nationally, and more residents land in the indifferent column. Sleep is the sharper signal: only about a fifth make it a real priority, well below the national third, which fits shift work, service hours, and tight household budgets.
Openness about mental health runs a little below average at the most vocal end, with more people keeping it private. In a city this Catholic and this multi-generational, struggles tend to stay inside the family and the parish rather than the open feed.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Scranton, Pennsylvania (investment style, savings behavior, and tech adoption) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.