Who lives in Sioux City, Iowa?
Iowa · Midwest · 85K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
Sioux City is a city of about 85,000 sitting at the tri-state corner where Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota fold together along the Missouri River, the regional hub for retail, medical care, and work across Siouxland. Its economy still runs on meat and grain. The Stockyards that once made this "The Marketplace for the Great Northwest" closed for good in 2002, but the packing line lives on at Seaboard Triumph's pork plant and the Tyson beef works just over the river, and that blue-collar wage base shapes who lives here. A large and growing Latino population, drawn by plant work, now makes up close to a quarter of the city.
The age spread is close to the country as a whole, with a mean around 46 and a slightly fuller band of younger adults in their late teens and twenties than the national figure. The clearest mark of this place is its slow hand with anything new. Only about 17% count as early adopters of technology against roughly 27% nationally, a working-river-town caution that runs through the rest of the profile.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Decision speed and risk appetite both sit close to the national shape, with only a faint pull toward caution at the high-risk end. Personality runs near baseline across the board. Openness sits a few points under the country, which fits a population that lets a product earn its place before trusting it, and the willingness to try the unproven is thinner here than average.
The other four traits are within a point or two of typical. Warmth toward others, steadiness under pressure, and sociability all read as ordinary for the city, so the lever that actually moves Sioux City is the appetite for the new, which is muted, rather than any swing in temperament.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision speed tracks the country closely, with a slight lean toward the quick and impulsive end and a thinner slice caught in over-analysis. This is not a city you move with manufactured urgency or ticking-clock scarcity, which would ring false to a steady, value-minded audience. Lead instead with a clear price and a concrete reason to act now that holds up on its own.
Risk appetite sits close to national with only a modest pull toward caution at the high end, which fits a working household economy with a thin savings cushion. Big upside and novelty pitches will not carry the weight here that guarantees, warranties, and easy returns do. When you do reach for an aspirational angle, anchor it to something safe and reversible so the downside feels covered.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
A few points below the national mark. Sioux City takes its time with the unfamiliar and wants to see a thing work before committing to it, the same caution that keeps its early-adopter share low. Lead with what is proven and demonstrable rather than what is novel or first-of-its-kind, because untested rarely sells here.
Right on the national line. Residents are about as orderly and follow-through-minded as the country at large, no more dutiful and no more casual. Plans and reliability framing land fine, but this is not a lever that distinguishes the city, so it should not carry the pitch on its own.
Essentially national. People here are as outgoing or as reserved as anywhere, with no particular tilt toward the social or the solitary. Messaging built around community and gathering works as well as it does broadly, without a local boost to lean on.
A hair above national. Residents are as ready to extend trust and good faith as the rest of the country, maybe slightly more so. Warm, plain-spoken, neighborly framing fits the place and will not feel out of step.
Just under national, meaning emotional footing is steady and even-keeled. Fear-based or high-anxiety appeals have little purchase on a population this calm. Reassurance and a measured tone do more work than urgency or alarm.
What they care about
Ethical sourcing carries less weight here than in most places. About 40% put no ethical filter on a purchase at all, a few points above the national share, and the strict end stays thin. In a town where the paycheck comes off a packing line, price and quality lead the buying decision and the moral story behind a product rarely closes the sale.
Concern for the environment and the pull toward local business both track close to national, so neither is a real lever. Corporate skepticism is unremarkable too. These are people who judge a company on what it delivers rather than on the cause it attaches itself to.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the spine of reach in Sioux City, claiming around 31% as a primary platform, with YouTube and Instagram filling in behind and a TikTok share running a touch above national. The pull toward video over text holds here, with short video the single largest format preference and long video close behind, so the channels that work are visual and built for a feed people already scroll.
Ad receptivity sits in neutral for about half the city, more than the national share, which means messaging neither bounces off nor gets eagerly welcomed. It has to earn attention on its own terms. Given how slow this audience is to embrace the new, the proof has to be visible and concrete rather than promissory.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
The savings picture is the financial tell. Aggressive savers run lighter than the country, about 20% against roughly 26%, with the weight shifting into sporadic and non-saving habits. That fits a wage base built on packing-plant and service work, where the cushion to set money aside is thin and saving happens when it can rather than on a schedule. Purchase frequency and what drives a purchase both sit close to national, with price doing the heavy lifting.
Returns happen less often here, with roughly 20% sending things back frequently versus about 27% nationally. Read alongside the slow-to-adopt streak, that points to careful, considered buying up front rather than buy-now-decide-later churn. When they commit, they tend to keep it.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is where this city pulls hardest away from the norm. Only about 24% take a proactive approach to their own health against roughly 34% nationally, and the share who treat wellness as an organizing project is small. Most land in the aware-but-passive middle: they know what they should be doing and get to it when something forces the issue. The local federally qualified health center and the regional hospitals that serve all of Siouxland point to a population that leans on care when it is needed rather than chasing it ahead of time.
Premium wellness spending is rare, with only about 4% reaching for the high-end tier against roughly 11% nationally. Sleep and mental-wellness openness sit near typical, so the gap is about money and posture, not stigma. Affordable and practical beats aspirational in anything health-adjacent here.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Sioux City, Iowa (tech adoption, health consciousness, and social proof need) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.