Who lives in Smyrna, Georgia?
Georgia · South · 56K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Smyrna compares
Where Smyrna lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Smyrna is a suburb of about 55,863 people in Cobb County, roughly ten miles northwest of downtown Atlanta, wrapped around the walkable Market Village and sitting next to Truist Park and The Battery in the Cumberland area. The age curve reads young for a suburb: the mean sits near 43.5 against about 47.2 nationally, the 25-to-34 band carries roughly 27% of residents versus about 20% nationally, and the 35-to-44 band runs near 23% against about 16%, while the 65-plus share thins to about 12%.
The single loudest signal here is how readily this audience picks up new technology. About 49% are early adopters, close to 1.8 times the national share, which fits a Home Depot and IBM and Glock professional base that skews toward technical and scientific work and pulls in young millennial households drawn by townhome construction and the short walk to the Village Green.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Decision speed and risk appetite both lean a little forward of the country. Roughly a third of residents land in the high or very-high risk buckets, a tilt that matches a young, employed suburb with room to chase upside rather than guard a thin cushion. Personality sits close to the national mean across the board, with the only real daylight on the calm end: this is a settled, low-strain group that does not run hot under pressure.
Openness and conscientiousness each edge a few points above baseline, a quiet pairing of curiosity about the new with follow-through once a choice is made. Neither moves enough to build a campaign on, so the framing that earns its keep is competence and momentum rather than reassurance.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Environmental concern runs warmer than typical. Only about 17% of residents register as unconcerned against roughly 27% nationally, and the active and activist ends both sit above the national share, so sustainability claims read as relevant rather than performative. Ethical consumption follows the same line, with the regular and strict buckets near 28% and 10% against about 21% and 7%.
The pull toward local business is moderate and real, with only about 5% indifferent to where they spend against roughly 10% nationally, which tracks a city built around an independent restaurant row at Market Village. Trust in large companies sits right at the national mark, so neither corporate polish nor anti-corporate posturing moves this audience much.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here runs through earned attention more than interruption. About 49% have cut the cord against roughly a third nationally, podcast avoidance is half the national rate with only about 17% listening to none, and LinkedIn over-indexes for a residential audience, all of which point to a professional crowd that consumes on its own schedule. Facebook and Instagram still carry the broad base, with TikTok a notch above typical.
Two cautions shape the approach. About 44% are outright negative on advertising against roughly 33% nationally, and far fewer residents stop at simply reading reviews, so they vet before they buy. Lead with substantiated proof and real review presence rather than paid push, since the ad itself starts at a deficit.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
This is a household economy that saves hard and puts money to work. The aggressive-saver share sits near 34% against about 26% nationally, while the non-saver share thins to roughly 18% from about 27%. The same discipline shows up in investing, where only about 21% sit out of the market entirely against roughly 38% nationally, close to 1.8 times fewer non-investors.
Buying happens often, with the weekly bucket near 28% against about 20% nationally and the rare bucket cut nearly in half. Price and quality still drive the why of a purchase at national rates, so the opening is frequency and engagement rather than a different motive: these are people in market regularly who reward brands that keep earning the next transaction.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is close to a defining trait here. Only about 5% of residents are indifferent to it against roughly 20% nationally, a gap of around fifteen points, and the proactive bucket near 48% plus an obsessive share near 18% both run well ahead of the country. This is a population that treats wellness as routine maintenance, and wellness spending backs it up, with only about 14% keeping that budget minimal against roughly 27% nationally.
Openness about mental health leans forward too, with the open and advocate buckets together above the national share and fewer residents keeping it private. Messaging that treats fitness, prevention, and candor about wellbeing as normal adult behavior will land cleanly.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Smyrna, Georgia (tech adoption, investment style, and podcast listening) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.