Who lives in Spring Hill, Florida?
Florida · South · 117K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Spring Hill compares
Where Spring Hill lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Spring Hill is an unincorporated community of about 116,882 people in Hernando County, the largest piece of Florida's Nature Coast and the one the Mackle Brothers' Deltona Corporation carved out of timberland in the late 1960s to sell affordable lots to retirees. That history still shapes the place. The age curve runs older than the country, with the 65-and-up band near 28% against roughly 21% nationally and a mean age around 51, while the under-35 share thins out below national in every bracket.
The defining behavioral signal is risk management at the household level. Close to 52% carry insurance coverage rated adequate, above the national 41%, the posture of people who own their homes outright or close to it and intend to keep what they have. It pairs with credit that comes in good for about 57% of residents, well over the national 47%.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality these residents read close to the national grain, which is itself worth saying for a place this retirement-heavy. Conscientiousness runs the highest of the five and sits a few points above baseline, the orderly, follow-through temperament you would expect from a community built on deed restrictions and HOA covenants. Openness ticks up slightly and the rest land essentially at the middle.
Decision-making is measured rather than rushed, with the deliberate and analysis-paralysis ends carrying a touch more weight than the impulsive one. These are not people who buy on a countdown clock. They want to read the fine print first.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
The clearest value here is a quiet one: loyalty to local independents is weak. Only about 8% feel strongly about choosing local business, against 16% nationally, and the "none" share runs higher than the country. That fits a master-planned exurb laid out around strip plazas, chain pharmacies, and big-box anchors along Commercial Way and Mariner, where the nearest store is the national one and few residents grew up with a Main Street merchant to stay faithful to.
Environmental priority, ethical-consumption habits, and corporate trust all track the national middle, so cause-led positioning has little extra purchase to gain or lose here.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach skews toward the platforms an older, settled audience already lives on. Facebook holds the largest single share at roughly 31%, in line with the country but carrying more of the actual daily attention here given the age profile, and Instagram runs a few points above national while TikTok sits below.
Format preference is broad rather than pointed: short video, mixed feeds, and plain text all pull near or slightly above baseline, with long-form video the one format running under. Clear, skimmable text and short clips carry further than long productions.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Saving here is real but uneven. The sporadic bucket swells to about 37% against the national 30%, while the aggressive end falls to 20% from 26%. These are households that set money aside when a good month allows rather than on a fixed schedule, consistent with fixed-income retirees and working families on Hernando wages who put something away when the cushion is there.
Purchase motivation and frequency sit at the national center, with price and quality leading the reasons people buy, so the spending story is about timing and capacity more than taste.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture is the throughline of daily life. About 52% approach care preventively versus the national 42%, the indifferent share is held down near 13% against roughly 20%, and the obsessive end is thin. This is a community that keeps its appointments and fills its prescriptions, which makes sense in a county anchored by Bayfront Health Spring Hill, Oak Hill, and the Tampa General outposts, where a large retiree base keeps clinics busy.
Sleep gets protected too: the low-priority share sits near 14% against the national 22%. Openness about mental wellness leans a little more forthcoming than average, with the private end pulled down and the open end up.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Spring Hill, Florida (insurance orientation, healthcare style, and credit health) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.