Who lives in Springfield, Ohio?
Ohio · Midwest · 59K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Springfield compares
Where Springfield lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Springfield sits between Dayton and Columbus, a Clark County city of about 58,645 built on a century of truck and machine work that ran from Warder, Bushnell and Glessner through International Harvester and Navistar. The age curve is close to the country as a whole, with a mean near 48 and a slightly fuller band past 55, the shape of a place where factory families stayed put through decades of plant downsizing.
The defining trait is one no headcount captures: about 48% of residents are indifferent to their own health, roughly two and a half times the national rate, while only around a tenth take a proactive line. This is the through-line of a thin-margin, working-class economy, and it shows up again in money. Roughly 57% hold no investments at all and only about a tenth save aggressively, well under half the usual share, with excellent credit reaching under 10% against a quarter nationally.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality Springfield reads as ordinary. Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional steadiness all land within a point or two of the national mean, so the distance in this audience is behavioral rather than temperamental. People here are about as curious, organized, and outgoing as the country at large.
Decision speed and risk tolerance tell the real story. Most residents weigh a purchase at a normal pace, and appetite for risk tilts cautious, with the high and very-high bands running several points light. That fits households that have learned to absorb a paycheck economy without much cushion. They are not slow thinkers, they are careful spenders.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values here are practical before they are principled. Around 46% report no ethical-consumption habits and roughly a third sit unconcerned about the environment, both running above the national grain, so green or cause-based positioning has a smaller foothold than it would elsewhere.
Loyalty to local business is real but soft. A plurality lean moderately toward shopping local, yet only about a tenth hold a strong preference, roughly half the usual share, which tracks a town where the nearest big-box and warehouse retail carry the weekly run. Corporate skepticism sits close to the middle of the country, so trust in companies is neither a hook nor a hard barrier.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the front door, carrying about a third of residents as their main platform, with YouTube running a little above national at roughly 15%. The newer, faster channels stay light, which matches an audience slow to adopt and quick to wait others out.
Format preference splits evenly between short video, long video, and mixed content, with no clear winner, so reach comes from showing up where they already are rather than betting on a single medium. Plain, substantiated messaging on Facebook and YouTube does more work here than polish.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Price leads the buying decision for about a third of residents, with quality close behind, and the cart fills less often than the national pattern. Around 21% buy only rarely and just a tenth shop weekly, roughly half the usual weekly share, the spending cadence of households watching the margin between checks.
The savings and investing picture is the same story in another ledger. Roughly 40% are non-savers and only about a tenth save aggressively, while about 57% hold no investments. Early tech adoption is rare, near 12% against more than a quarter nationally, so this is a wait-and-see, prove-it-first buyer rather than a first-mover.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The indifferent health posture extends straight into how Springfield handles its body and money. Roughly 46% spend minimally on wellness and a similar share use healthcare reactively, waiting for something to break rather than booking the checkup. Preventive framing has a thin audience here.
Sleep is the second-loudest signal: only about 13% treat rest as a priority, roughly two and a half times fewer than the country, the rhythm of shift work and early plant and warehouse starts. Openness to talking about mental wellness runs a touch below national, leaning private and selective, so support lands better framed as quiet and personal than public and aspirational.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Springfield, Ohio (health consciousness, sleep priority, and investment style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.