Who lives in St. Cloud, Minnesota?
Minnesota · Midwest · 69K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow St. Cloud compares
Where St. Cloud lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
St. Cloud is a roughly 68,910-person regional hub on the Mississippi River in central Minnesota, the trade, hospital, and college center that pulls shoppers and patients in from a wide rural ring. The age curve runs young for a Midwestern city of its size: the 18-24 band sits near 24% against about 13% nationally, the print of St. Cloud State University and the technical college on a town that doubles as a campus. The mean age lands around 42, several years below the national figure.
The deepest cultural mark is faith. About 43% of residents identify as Catholic, close to double the national share, the long inheritance of the German-Catholic settlers who founded the city around its parishes in the 1800s. That history sits alongside a large and still-growing Somali community that has reshaped the schools and storefronts since the early 2000s, giving St. Cloud a demographic texture wider than the regional-hub label suggests.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality the city tracks close to the national baseline across the board, so the story is not temperament. Openness runs a few points under average and the rest sit within a point or two of typical, a steady, unflashy disposition that fits a working trade town more than a trend-chasing one.
Where St. Cloud does lean is on the front end of a decision. The impulsive share runs above national while the careful, drawn-out end thins out, the pattern of a younger, lower-stakes shopper who moves on a purchase without a long deliberation. Risk appetite, by contrast, barely departs from the national spread.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values here read close to the American middle. Environmental priority, ethical-consumption habits, and trust in big companies all sit within a couple of points of typical, so neither green framing nor a crusading anti-corporate pitch finds much extra purchase. The skeptical-to-neutral read on corporations mirrors the country at large.
One mild tilt is worth naming: the strong preference for buying local runs a touch below national, and the share with no local preference at all runs slightly above. For a regional retail center built around Crossroads Center and the big-box corridor, that points to a population shaped by where it already shops, convenient and chain-anchored, rather than a deep loyalty to the independent storefront.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
The platform mix is close to the national grid, with Facebook the largest single channel and Instagram next, so media planning here is about format more than venue. Short video runs several points above national while plain text trails, which means a quick, watchable clip will outrun a wall of copy.
The standout for messaging is tone. Ad receptivity skews heavily neutral, well above national, meaning most residents neither welcome nor wall off advertising. They are persuadable but not primed, so the lever is a clear, substantiated reason to act rather than hype that bounces off an indifferent audience.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money is the loudest signal in St. Cloud, and it points one direction: thin margins. Aggressive saving runs near 16% against about 26% nationally, and the non-saver and sporadic-saver bands swell to fill the gap. Excellent credit is just as scarce, near 15% versus about 25%, and the share holding no investments at all runs noticeably above national. This is a paycheck-paced economy of students, service and retail workers, and hospital and quarry staff, with little built-up cushion behind it.
Buying habits match the cash flow. Weekly shopping runs below national and the occasional cadence above it, the rhythm of households that pace spending to need. Frequent returners are scarcer than average too, a sign of more considered, lower-volume purchasing rather than churn.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
St. Cloud's health posture leans toward attention without much follow-through. The "aware" band of health consciousness runs several points above national while the deeply committed, obsessive end nearly vanishes, describing residents who know roughly what they should be doing without organizing their lives around it.
The same gap shows in care. The reactive-only style, treating problems as they surface rather than heading them off, runs well above national, a fit with a younger, budget-minded population that leans on the regional hospital system when something goes wrong more than on steady preventive upkeep. Openness to talking about mental health sits right at the national norm.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to St. Cloud, Minnesota (savings behavior, credit health, and ad receptivity) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.