Who lives in St. Louis?
Missouri · Midwest · 298K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
St. Louis is a roughly 298,000-person independent city wrapped around the west bank of the Mississippi, governed apart from the county that shares its name. Its racial makeup is the loudest line in the profile: around 42% of residents are Black, about three times the national share, the legacy of a Great Migration city whose neighborhood lines still shape so much that locals greet each other by asking where you went to high school. The age curve runs a touch younger than the country, with the 25-to-34 band carrying about 26% of adults against roughly 20% nationally.
Faith sits closer to the surface here than the river city's brewing-town reputation suggests. Close to 47% identify as evangelical, well above the national figure near 26%, a reach that takes in historically Black Baptist and AME congregations alongside the metro's large non-denominational churches. That religious density helps explain a population that thinks hard about right and wrong in everyday choices.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality St. Louis tracks close to the national baseline, with two modest exceptions worth naming. Conscientiousness runs a few points high, the planning-and-follow-through tendency you would expect from a settled Midwestern population. Sensitivity to stress also sits a notch above average, which fits a city where a real share of households are managing month to month without much cushion.
Decision-making is unhurried but not paralyzed, sitting near the national pattern with a slight lean toward weighing options before committing. The takeaway for anyone selling here: manufactured urgency and countdown-clock scarcity will mostly fall flat. Give them the substance to reason through and they will.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision-making leans deliberate without tipping into gridlock, close to the national shape with a slight pull toward weighing things first. That rules out the fast levers: flash scarcity and countdown urgency will mostly be ignored. Lead instead with substantiation and side-by-side proof, the kind of evidence a careful buyer can actually check before committing.
Risk appetite sits almost exactly at the national middle, with no real tilt either way. Read against the rest of the profile, though, the thin savings and light credit health mean the cushion to absorb a bad bet is small even where the willingness exists. Guarantees, easy returns, and low-commitment trials will reassure more reliably than big-upside or novelty framing.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
A hair above the national mark, which means curiosity about the new sits right around the middle of the road here. St. Louis will give a fresh idea a fair hearing but feels no special pull toward the untested, so pair anything novel with a reason it is sound rather than leaning on novelty alone.
The clearest lift in the personality profile. These residents skew toward planning, reliability, and seeing commitments through, the steady habits of a settled Midwestern city. Promises about durability, consistency, and doing what you said you would do land well with people built this way.
Essentially national. Social energy here is neither outsized nor withdrawn, so neither a loud crowd-driven pitch nor an introvert-coded one has an edge. Read the channel, not the city, on this one.
Right at the national line. St. Louisans extend trust and good faith about as readily as anyone, which makes warmth a safe register without being a distinguishing one. Lead with it, just do not expect it to do the heavy lifting.
A few points above average, a low hum of stress sensitivity rather than anything dramatic. It fits a place where many households run without much financial margin, so reassurance, guarantees, and calm-the-nerves framing carry more weight than they would in a more cushioned audience.
What they care about
This is where St. Louis separates itself. About 16.6% of residents say ethics never enter their purchasing, against roughly a third of the country, and nearly 13% hold a strict ethical line on what they will buy, close to double the national rate. The same conscience shows up on the environment, where only about 14% are unconcerned versus roughly 27% nationally, and around 36% take active steps. Social causes pull people in too: only about a tenth sit fully on the sidelines.
Trust in big institutions runs thin to match. Fewer than 11% describe themselves as trusting of corporations, and the strongest tier of local-business loyalty is comparatively light at under 9%, so the appetite for ethics here is more about how a company behaves than a reflexive preference for the shop down the street.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach mirrors the country with a St. Louis tilt toward visual feeds. Facebook still carries the widest share at around 27%, but Instagram over-indexes at about 23%, running ahead of the national figure. Short video is the leading content format at roughly 29%. There is no niche platform that unlocks this city; the win is showing up where most people already are, on Facebook and Instagram, with short visual storytelling.
Because ethics and environment register so strongly, the creative that lands will carry a credible values thread rather than treating it as a bolt-on. Substance over urgency holds true in media as much as in the pitch.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
The financial picture is the counterweight to all that conscience. Around 41% put nothing aside in a normal month, well above the national 27%, and only about 14% save aggressively, roughly half the typical rate. Credit health and investing follow the same grain: excellent credit is less common here at around 14%, and close to 47% hold no investments at all.
What drives the actual purchase stays ordinary, with price and quality leading much as they do everywhere. The lever that does move is ethics, which weighs more heavily here than nationally even though budgets are tight. The read for marketers: most of this audience is buying close to the bone, so value has to be real and the ethical story has to be true, because there is little slack to absorb a regretted splurge.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture leans practical. About 41% describe themselves as aware of their health without obsessing over it, and the most intensive, optimizing tier is light at around 6%. This is a keep-an-eye-on-it population rather than a quantified-self one, which fits a metro where the largest employers, BJC HealthCare and the Washington University medical complex, make healthcare a daily fact of life rather than a hobby.
On mental wellness the city is more forthcoming than average. Only about 14% keep it strictly private and roughly 36% are openly comfortable with the subject, so messaging around therapy, counseling, or emotional health can speak plainly without much fear of recoil.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to St. Louis, Missouri (ethical consumption level, environmental priority, and savings behavior) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.