Who lives in Vancouver, Washington
Washington · West · 191K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Vancouver compares
Where Vancouver lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Vancouver sits on the Washington side of the Columbia River, a city of about 190,700 directly across from Portland and tied to it by a daily flow of commuters. The age curve is ordinary, a mean near 47 that tracks the country almost exactly, and the gender split is even. What sets the place apart is not who lives here on paper but how they treat their own time and bodies.
The loudest signal is sleep. Close to half of residents, about 49%, hold rest as a high priority, against roughly a third of the country. That instinct extends outward: only about 7% are indifferent to their health, a far smaller share than the national one in five, and most describe themselves as proactive about it. For a metro known for its tax-border thrift, the spending that survives is the kind aimed at feeling well.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality Vancouver hugs the national baseline, which is the honest read for most cities. Openness runs a few points high, a mild taste for the new that suits a waterfront still under construction, while extraversion sits slightly low and the other three traits land essentially at the mean.
The decision style is patient rather than impulsive, leaning toward deliberation by a small margin. These residents like a beat to weigh a choice, which means proof and the freedom to reconsider matter more than pressure. Risk appetite is close to the middle, open to upside when the downside is spelled out.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Vancouver's values read more pragmatic than crusading. Environmental concern, ethical buying, and trust in big companies all track the national middle, so a green or activist pitch carries no special charge here and an anti-corporate one finds no extra grievance to feed.
The one real tilt runs against expectation: a strong, exclusive loyalty to local business is less common than nationally, with only about one in ten holding that as a firm preference. The pull of cheaper, tax-free shopping a short drive across the river into Oregon competes hard with buy-local sentiment, and convenience tends to win.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Vancouver has largely cut the cord. Cord cutters make up about 43% of residents against a third nationally, so streaming and on-demand reach people that cable no longer does. Podcast habits point the same way: the share listening to none drops to roughly 22%, well below the national third, making audio a live channel rather than an afterthought.
On social platforms Facebook still leads but pulls a few points lighter than nationally, with Instagram picking up the slack and LinkedIn running slightly rich. The harder constraint is tone. Negative ad receptivity sits well above the national rate, near 43%, so interruptive or hard-sell formats actively backfire. Reach this audience through useful, low-pressure content they choose to play.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Vancouver shops often and sends a lot back. Weekly buyers run above the national rate and the rare shopper is uncommon, a cadence of frequent, smaller purchases rather than occasional big ones. The standout is returns: close to 40% send things back frequently, well above the national norm, so a friction free exchange policy is doing real work here, not sitting in the fine print.
Saving leans casual. Sporadic savers outnumber steady ones and the committed non-saver is less common than nationally, which points to households that put money away when they can rather than on a fixed plan. Generous return windows and low-commitment trials suit this mix better than lock-in or long contracts.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is where Vancouver is most itself. Health consciousness runs well above the national rate, with the indifferent share shrinking to about 7% and proactive habits the norm. Wellness spending follows the same line: only about 15% keep it minimal, far below the national share, so a budget for feeling good is closer to standard than to a splurge.
The openness extends to the mind as well as the body. Residents who keep mental wellness strictly private fall to roughly one in ten, while those open about it or actively championing it together make up a clear majority. Talking plainly about sleep, stress, and care fits how this city already lives.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Vancouver, Washington (sleep priority, return behavior, and health consciousness) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.