Who lives in Waldorf, Maryland
Maryland · South · 81K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Waldorf compares
Where Waldorf lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Waldorf is a suburban community of about 81,000 in Charles County, roughly 25 miles south of Washington, DC. It grew from a crossroads of a few thousand people in 1980 into one of the region's centers of the Black middle class, and the population reflects that history: about 61% of residents are Black, against roughly 14% nationally. Most households own their homes, and a large share commute north into the District and its inner suburbs for federal, professional, and healthcare work.
The age curve sits close to the country as a whole, with a mean around 46 and a slightly thinner band of residents 65 and older. This is a settled, working-age, homeowning population more than a town of young transplants or retirees, and the behaviors below read like the choices of people managing established households on solid but commute-stretched incomes.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality Waldorf sits almost exactly on the national line. Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional steadiness all land within a point or two of average, so there is no temperamental quirk driving the profile. Decision-making is similarly measured, leaning quick rather than impulsive, with few residents stuck in prolonged back-and-forth.
Where the distance shows is in posture toward money and risk. Appetite for risk tilts a touch higher than average at the top end while the most cautious bucket thins out, which fits a homeowning population with some cushion rather than households living check to check. The mind of this audience is pragmatic and willing to move, not reckless.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Waldorf households put real weight behind ethical spending. Only about a fifth say it never factors in, well below the national third, and the share who weigh it regularly runs noticeably higher. Environmental priority follows the same line, with the unconcerned bucket shrinking and an active, do-something stance gaining ground over passive awareness.
Preference for local business tracks the national pattern closely, so the values story here is less about Main Street loyalty and more about how a product is made and what a company stands for. For brands, the credible move is substance on sourcing and conduct rather than a generic shop-local appeal.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
This is a connected, current audience. Technology laggards are rare, about 15% against 28% nationally, so there is little need to design around holdouts or legacy habits. Streaming reflects it: cord-cutters make up roughly 43% here, well above national, meaning the household has largely moved off traditional cable.
Social platform use mirrors the country, with Facebook the largest single channel and Instagram and YouTube behind it, so the difference is the delivery rather than the venue. Reach Waldorf through streaming and digital video on devices these households already use, and skip the assumption that a cable spot or a print circular will land.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Saving is a habit here. The non-saver bucket runs about nine points below national while aggressive savers climb above it, the pattern of households building toward a goal rather than drifting. That discipline pairs with active investing: the share who hold no investments at all sits well under the national mark, consistent with a homeowning, salaried base putting money to work.
Buying rhythm is frequent and routine. Monthly and weekly purchasing both run above average while rare and occasional shopping fall off, and returns happen more often than the norm, which suggests confident online ordering with the expectation of sending things back. Reach these buyers on cadence and convenience, with easy returns treated as part of the offer rather than a concession.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is where Waldorf's profile is most clearly its own. Preventive care is the dominant style, chosen by about 55% against roughly 42% nationally, a sign of a population that schedules the checkup and the screening rather than waiting for something to break. Comprehensive insurance is the second-loudest signal on the whole profile, held by about 43% versus 30% nationally, which points to good employer coverage common among federal and professional households.
General health consciousness leans proactive and aware, with the indifferent share well below average and the obsessive end also thinner than typical. This is steady, mainstream attention to well-being, the kind that fills in a coverage form completely and keeps the annual appointment, not extreme wellness culture.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Waldorf, Maryland (race ethnicity, insurance orientation, and tech adoption) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.