Who lives in Wichita Falls, Texas?
Texas · South · 102K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWho they are
Wichita Falls sits in North Texas near the Oklahoma line, a city of about 102,000 built on Sheppard Air Force Base, Midwestern State University, and an older oil, gas, and agriculture base. The single loudest trait here is how residents handle health: roughly 45% are reactive, addressing medical needs only once something goes wrong, against about 30% nationally. The county has long carried a federal medically underserved designation, and that shortage of routine care shows up directly in the behavior.
The faith profile is the other defining mark. About 49% identify as evangelical, close to double the national share, the kind of churchgoing majority that shapes how a place talks about family, money, and obligation. The age curve skews a touch younger than the country, with the 18-to-24 band near 18% against roughly 13% nationally, a lift the base and the university both feed. Men outnumber women here, about 54% to 46%.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Wichita Falls sits close to the national baseline across the board, so the story is not temperament. Conscientiousness and openness each run a few points above average, a mild steadiness paired with a little curiosity, while willingness to engage socially and warmth toward strangers both land right at the country's level. The one quiet lean is toward a bit more day-to-day worry, which fits a working-class economy where a single setback lands hard.
Where the real distance opens is in habits rather than disposition. How fast residents decide and how much risk they will stomach both track the country almost exactly. The thing to read is not how they think but what they do with money and health, where the gaps are wide.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision speed tracks the country almost exactly, with the same mix of quick movers and careful deliberators. That flatness rules out manufactured urgency as a lever, since this is not a crowd primed to act on a ticking clock. Given how price-sensitive and budget-tight the audience is, lead with plain substantiation and side-by-side proof of value rather than countdowns or scarcity.
Risk appetite holds right at the national shape, neither bold nor especially cautious by disposition. Read against the rest of the profile, though, the thin savings and minimal insurance mean the real-world tolerance for a costly misstep is low even when the stated appetite is average. Guarantees, easy returns, and low-commitment entry points will reassure more than upside or novelty.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
A few points above the national mark, enough to signal a real if modest appetite for trying something different rather than sticking only to the familiar. It is not a restless, trend-chasing crowd, so the room to run is for fresh and practical over safe and stale. Lead with what is new and useful, and it will get a hearing.
Sitting a touch above average, which reads as a population that values follow-through and keeping its word. That steadiness sits oddly next to the reactive health and thin-savings habits, a sign those gaps come from tight budgets rather than a careless streak. Reliability and clear commitments land better than flash.
Right at the national level, so there is no strong pull either toward the outgoing or the reserved. Wichita Falls residents are about as ready to gather and engage as the country at large. Neither high-energy social proof nor quiet one-to-one framing has a built-in edge, so let the offer decide the tone.
Effectively national, with no lean toward either guarded or unusually trusting. People here extend good faith about as readily as anyone else. Warmth and straight dealing carry their normal weight, and there is no need to over-soften the approach.
A couple of points above average, a mild edge of worry that fits a place where a thin financial cushion makes setbacks bite. It is not anxiety as a defining trait, more a sensitivity to instability. Messaging that steadies and reassures will sit better than anything that manufactures pressure.
What they care about
The clearest value signal is the absence of an instinct that runs strong in many towns: about 20% of residents express no preference for local businesses at all, roughly double the national rate, and only about 7% hold a strong one. A military-heavy, frequently relocating population builds fewer ties to a specific main street, and convenience and price tend to win over loyalty to the shop down the road.
Trust in big institutions runs a little thinner than average too, with the cynical end of the corporate-skepticism spectrum sitting a few points high. Brand loyalty is loose: about a third behave as mercenaries who will switch for a better deal without hesitation. Environmental and ethical-consumption attitudes hold close to the national middle.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is lighter than the national norm here, sitting near 24% as a primary platform against roughly 31%, while Instagram runs ahead at about 24%. That tilt fits the younger, base-and-campus skew, and it means reach built only on Facebook will miss a real slice of this audience.
Short video is the most-favored format, edging above the national share, and influencer recommendations carry unusual weight: about 29% count themselves trusting of them, well above average. A credible local voice will move more here than a polished institutional pitch.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money is tight and short-horizon. About 38% of residents save nothing, well above the national figure, and the aggressive-saver share is cut nearly in half, down to about 15% from a national 26%. That is a household economy living close to the paycheck, common in a place where oil-field, retail, and base-adjacent work sets the pace.
The same thin cushion shows in how care is bought. Insurance runs minimal, credit health skews below average with only about 16% holding excellent credit against roughly 25% nationally, and purchases trend toward the practical. Price drives more decisions here than status or polish.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is where the city's economy presses hardest on daily life. The reactive-care posture that leads the profile pairs with light coverage, with about 31% carrying minimal insurance against roughly 20% nationally, so a checkup easily becomes an emergency-room visit. On awareness, residents actually skew engaged rather than indifferent: about 46% describe themselves as health aware, above the national share, but the proactive follow-through stays scarce and the obsessive end is rare.
Openness about mental health leans toward the selective, with people choosing carefully who they confide in rather than going fully private or fully public. The gap between knowing what would help and being able to act on it runs through this whole part of the picture.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Wichita Falls, Texas (healthcare style, savings behavior, and insurance orientation) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.