Who lives in Lakewood, California?
California · West · 81K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Lakewood compares
Where Lakewood lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Lakewood sits in southeast Los Angeles County between Long Beach and Cerritos, the city that rose almost overnight from sugar-beet fields in the early 1950s when developers laid down some 17,500 tract homes on a defense-and-aerospace boom. About 81,499 people live here now, and the defining habit is a forward lean on health: close to half manage it proactively, against roughly a third of the country, with another one in seven going further still.
The age curve is ordinary for a settled California suburb, with a mean near 46 and a healthy middle, and the gender split runs even. What sets the place apart is the financial discipline layered on top of those single-family lots. Comprehensive insurance coverage runs near 45% against roughly 30% nationally, and excellent credit shows up in about 37% of households versus a quarter of the country. This is a homeownership culture built for the long haul rather than the next paycheck.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Lakewood tracks the national baseline almost exactly. Openness, how much someone chases the new versus the familiar, sits a hair above average, and the other four traits land within a point of typical. The interesting distance is behavioral, not temperamental: residents are slightly quicker to decide than the country and a little less prone to stalling in deliberation, which suits a place where people know what they want from a home and a household.
Risk appetite tilts modestly upward. The high end of the scale outweighs the cautious end here, consistent with households that have savings behind them and can stomach a calculated bet without betting the house. Confidence here is funded, not reckless.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Ethical buying is more of a live concern than the national norm. Strict and regular ethically-minded purchasing together cover roughly 40% of residents, and the share who say it never factors in is well below the country at large. Environmental priority leans the same way, with the actively engaged outnumbering the unconcerned.
Trust in companies sits near neutral, with a slight warm tilt, and the preference for local business is moderate rather than fervent. Values steer the cart here without turning every purchase into a referendum, so claims that are real and checkable land better than loud positioning.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach in Lakewood looks like mainstream suburban California with no exotic platform skew. Facebook carries the largest single share at about 31%, Instagram sits near 19%, and short video is the leading content format, all within a point or two of national. The audience is broad and findable rather than concentrated in one channel.
The opening that works leans on early-adopter receptivity: about 40% of residents take up new technology ahead of the curve versus roughly 27% nationally, so a credible new tool or product earns a hearing if it can show its work. Pair short video reach with proof and longevity claims rather than novelty for its own sake.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Saving is where Lakewood pulls hardest away from the pack. Aggressive savers make up about 41% of residents against roughly a quarter nationally, and the non-saver share is correspondingly thin. That cushion underwrites everything else: comprehensive insurance, excellent credit, and a strong appetite for investing, with the share holding no investments at all down near 23% from almost 38% nationally.
Purchase rhythm runs a touch heavier than the country, with weekly buyers up and the rare-buyer end thinned out. Price and quality drive the cart in roughly even measure, so steady value beats one-off discounts for a household that plans its outflows.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is the throughline of daily life in Lakewood. Beyond the proactive majority, preventive care is the dominant style at close to 57% against roughly 42% nationally, meaning screenings and check-ups rather than waiting for something to break. Spending follows the same logic: the share that puts minimal money toward wellness is far below the national rate, near 15% against more than a quarter.
Openness to mental-wellness conversation runs right at the national mark, neither guarded nor especially vocal. The picture is a household that budgets for prevention and treats upkeep, of the body and the home alike, as routine maintenance.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Lakewood, California (health consciousness, insurance orientation, and savings behavior) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.