Who lives in Lawton, Oklahoma
Oklahoma · South · 91K residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Lawton compares
Where Lawton lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Lawton is a city of about 91,000 in the southwest corner of Oklahoma, pressed up against Fort Sill, the Army's field artillery and air defense school. The post cycles thousands of trainees and soldiers through every year, and that churn pulls the city younger than most: the 18-24 and 25-34 bands together hold roughly 42% of residents against about 32% nationally, and the median age sits near 43. Goodyear's tire plant, Comanche County Memorial Hospital, and Cameron University fill out the civilian payroll.
The faith picture is the quiet headline. Around 56% of residents identify as evangelical, better than double the national share, which is the religious fingerprint of small-city Oklahoma rather than anything specific to the base. That churchgoing majority sits alongside a working-class income base and a population developed on the former reservation lands of the Comanche, Kiowa, and Apache, whose tribal nations still anchor the surrounding county.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
How fast Lawton decides and how much risk it stomachs both track close to the rest of the country, so the interesting part is where the profile leans. Appetite for risk tips slightly toward caution, with the very-high end thinner than typical, which fits a town living paycheck to paycheck on enlisted pay and factory wages.
On personality the five big traits all sit within a point or two of the national mean, so this is not a place defined by temperament. Curiosity about the new runs a touch below average and emotional volatility a touch above, a pairing that reads as practical and a little guarded rather than restless. Talk to Lawton as you would a neighbor who has heard the pitch before.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values run pragmatic. Roughly a third of residents call themselves unconcerned about the environment and only a sliver land in the activist camp, so green framing is a weak lever here. Ethical-sourcing claims land softly too, with most people either ignoring them or weighing them only occasionally.
Trust in big institutions skews wary. The cynical-toward-corporations slice runs above national while the genuinely trusting slice runs below, a stance that fits a town used to being a line item in defense budgets and plant decisions made elsewhere. Loyalty to local shops is real but soft, so price and familiarity beat a buy-local appeal.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the town square, claiming about 30% of residents as their main platform, with Instagram and YouTube trailing and a slightly elevated TikTok share riding the younger, soldier-heavy skew. Reach for the local Facebook feed before anything else.
On format, short video and a mixed text-and-image diet do the work; long video and text-only posts pull a little below average. Keep it brief, visual, and plainspoken, the way a unit page or a plant-shift group already talks.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money habits here run thin on cushion. Roughly 12% save aggressively against 26% nationally, while non-savers make up about 40% of the city. Credit health follows the same line: only about 12% hold excellent credit, half the national share. Around half of residents are non-investors, well above typical.
Spending itself is steady and modest. Weekly buyers are scarcer than average and occasional buyers more common, and price leads purchase decisions for the largest group. Insurance gets the same lean treatment, with about a third carrying only minimal coverage. Offers that respect a tight budget, with clear cost up front and no surprise commitments, will outperform anything that asks for a leap of faith.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is where Lawton separates from the pack. Close to 43% of residents are indifferent to their health, more than twice the national rate, and the proactive and obsessive ends both collapse to a fraction of typical. The same detachment shows in how they handle care: about 29% take an avoidant approach to the medical system, skipping checkups until something forces the issue.
Sleep gets shorted too. Only around 14% treat rest as a high priority, against roughly a third of the country, which lines up with shift work at the tire plant and the demands of a training post. Openness about mental health is slightly below average, with most people keeping it private or sharing only selectively. Wellness messaging that scolds or preaches will bounce; practical convenience is the way in.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Lawton, Oklahoma (health consciousness, sleep priority, and healthcare style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.