Who lives in Louisiana?
Louisiana · South · 4.57M residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWhere they live
The state's largest population centers and how its urban-to-rural mix diverges from the national balance.
Urban / rural split
audience % · vs. national baselineLargest cities
by populationWho they are
Louisiana is home to roughly 4.6 million people, spread across a suburban majority with a rural quarter that runs heavier than the country overall. The population fans out from New Orleans and Baton Rouge through Shreveport in the north and the Acadiana parishes around Lafayette, where French heritage still colors daily life. The age curve mirrors the nation almost exactly, with a mean near 47.
The demographic that sets the state apart is its racial makeup: about 39% of residents are Black, close to three times the national share, a legacy of plantation-era settlement along the Mississippi and the Gulf coast. The story that pulls hardest, though, is behavioral. Nearly four in ten residents are indifferent to their own health, far above the national rate, and that detachment threads through nearly everything else about how they live and spend.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On the core personality traits, Louisiana reads close to the national center. Openness, conscientiousness, and how warm and cooperative people tend to be all land within a point of average, and how much social energy residents draw from a crowd is dead level. The one small lift is in emotional reactivity, a couple of points above average, the kind of low-grade tension you would expect in a state that has weathered storms, floods, and an economy tied to volatile energy prices.
How people decide and how much risk they will stomach both track the country closely. The flatness matters here: there is no built-in appetite for the bold bet, and no unusual caution to work against either. What moves this audience is the quality of the case in front of them, not the temperament they bring to it.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision-making here tracks the national shape almost exactly, with no unusual rush and no unusual hesitation. For an audience this skeptical of corporations, that flatness rules out manufactured urgency and scarcity countdowns, which read as the angle they already distrust. Lead with plain substantiation and side-by-side proof, and let the case stand on its own pace.
Risk appetite sits close to the national center, with only a faint tilt toward the cautious end. Set against a profile where most households neither invest nor save and credit runs weaker than average, that means upside and novelty have thin ground to stand on. Guarantees, risk reversal, and low-commitment terms will carry more weight than the promise of a bigger payoff.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Right at the national center. Residents are about as willing to try something new as the country at large, with no special hunger for novelty and no reflexive guard against it. Fresh angles can work, but they earn their keep on the merits rather than on the appeal of being new.
A hair under average. Day-to-day diligence and follow-through look much like the rest of the country, so neither tight structure nor loose flexibility is the natural register. The low health and savings engagement elsewhere in the profile reflects priorities and means, not a shortfall of discipline you can scold or organize your way around.
Level with the nation. The pull toward company and the comfort in being out among people is ordinary here, which fits a culture built around festivals, food, and gathering without that sociability spilling into the survey average. Social proof and community framing land, but they are table stakes, not a special advantage.
Essentially national. Residents are no quicker or slower than average to extend trust to a person in front of them, even as trust in corporations runs noticeably thinner. Warmth and good-faith framing work fine at the human level; the skepticism to plan around is aimed at institutions, not individuals.
A couple of points above national, the slight edge of unease you would expect in a state that lives with hurricane seasons and an energy economy that swings with prices. Messaging that steadies and reassures will outperform messaging that manufactures alarm. Calm, concrete answers settle this audience faster than urgency does.
What they care about
Trust in big institutions runs thin. Only about one in ten residents give corporations the benefit of the doubt, and the skeptical and cynical ends of the scale both sit heavier than average, fitting a state where the petrochemical corridor along the river is both the paycheck and the grievance for a lot of households. Environmental concern leans the other way from what coastal land loss might suggest, with the unconcerned share running above national and the activist edge slightly below.
Ethical-consumption habits and preference for local business both sit near the national line, so neither is a hook worth leaning on. The dependable lever is earned credibility: this is an audience that assumes a company is working an angle until shown otherwise.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Media habits track the national pattern, which makes reach a question of dependable channels rather than novel ones. Facebook is the workhorse, claiming the largest share of primary platform use, with Instagram and YouTube filling in behind and a meaningful slice off social platforms altogether. Content appetite splits evenly across short video, long video, and mixed formats, with no strong tilt to chase.
One quieter signal shapes the plan: Louisiana over-indexes as a technology laggard, with about 41% slow to adopt against under 30% nationally. Newest-format and early-access strategies will outrun this audience. Proven, broadly available channels do the work here.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
The financial posture is conservative by way of staying out of the game. About 52% of residents are non-investors, and roughly 41% are non-savers, both well above national, while the aggressive-saving end falls short. Excellent credit is comparatively scarce, held by about 15% against a national share near a quarter, consistent with one of the lower-income economies in the South.
When money does move, price leads, matching the national split almost exactly, and weekly buying runs lighter than average with more purchasing in the rare and occasional ranges. Affordability, financing, and low-commitment terms carry weight with households that keep little cushion. Pitches built on long-horizon investing or premium positioning will find a narrow audience.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is the heart of the profile. Indifference to health is the loudest signal in the state, with close to 40% checked out of wellness entirely and the proactive and obsessive ends both thinned out well below average. Sleep gets treated as discretionary: better than a third rate it a low priority, far above the national share. Spending follows the same line, with roughly 41% putting minimal money toward wellness.
Openness to mental-wellness conversations sits near the national norm, a quieter signal inside an otherwise disengaged picture. The practical read is that health framing does not sell itself here. Routine, prevention, and self-improvement pitches land softly. Reaching this audience on wellness means meeting low engagement where it is, not assuming the appetite is already there.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Louisiana (health consciousness, sleep priority, and investment style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.