Who lives in Ohio?
Ohio · Midwest · 11.79M residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Ohio compares
Where Ohio lands in the 50-state rankings, and the states whose residents most closely match its behavioral profile.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 50 US statesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Cities that break the state pattern
distance from the Ohio norm, 0–100 · ↑ ↓ the trait driving itWho they are
Ohio is home to about 11.8 million people spread across a settlement pattern that is two-thirds suburban, with roughly 65% of residents in suburban communities and the rest split between the urban cores of Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati and the farm counties between them. The population is notably White, about 73% versus 57% nationally, the single most defining feature of who lives here and a marker of how little the great coastal migrations have reshaped the state.
The age profile sits slightly older than the country, with a mean near 48 and a 65-and-up share of about 22%. This is a settled population, anchored by the suburbs that ring its three big metros and by smaller industrial towns like Akron, Dayton, and Toledo that hold their residents for decades.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Ohio tracks the national baseline almost exactly. Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness all land within a point or two of the country, so the temperament here is steady and middle-of-the-road rather than sharply drawn in any direction. The one small lean is toward a touch more day-to-day worry than average.
Decision-making is similarly even. Ohioans split between quick and deliberate buyers at close to national proportions, with no real appetite for impulse and no paralysis either. Risk appetite is mild, sitting a notch toward caution, which fits a household economy built on stable wages rather than speculative upside.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 50 US states. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Ohio reads pragmatic on values. Close to 38% of residents express no ethical-consumption habit at all, somewhat above the national share, and the strict end of that spectrum is thin. Environmental concern and a preference for local business both sit near the country's middle, neither cause nor afterthought.
Corporate skepticism is ordinary here too, with most residents landing neutral on whether to trust big companies. The practical read is that purchases get judged on price and quality first, with cause and provenance treated as a bonus rather than a deciding factor.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Ohio is a Facebook state first. About 32% of residents name it their primary platform, the largest single share, with Instagram and YouTube trailing and the newer apps holding modest ground. Content appetite is balanced across short video, long video, and mixed formats, so no one medium dominates.
The practical implication is reach through broad, mainstream channels rather than niche ones. A message built to work on Facebook and general video, aimed at the suburban majority, covers most of the state without much waste.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending in Ohio is steady and price-led. About 36% of residents name price as their main purchase driver, with quality close behind, and shopping frequency clusters in the occasional and monthly ranges rather than the weekly impulse end. Saving habits sit near the national pattern, with the aggressive-saver share a touch lighter than average.
The investing posture is the more telling money signal. Roughly 42% of residents are non-investors, a few points above the country, which points to wealth held in homes, pensions, and savings accounts more than in brokerage portfolios. Offers framed around tangible value and proven worth fit this audience better than ones built on financial upside.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The clearest lifestyle signal is how Ohioans handle care. Only about 7% avoid the healthcare system, well under the national figure, so this is a population that keeps appointments and follows up. That habit sits alongside a more relaxed view of personal wellness: roughly a quarter call themselves indifferent to health consciousness, a few points above average, and the obsessive end is smaller than the country's.
Put together, the picture is one of practical maintenance over self-optimization. People here use the strong hospital systems that employ so many of them, but they are not chasing the latest wellness trend. Openness to mental-health conversation runs close to national, leaning slightly toward comfort rather than privacy.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Ohio (race ethnicity, healthcare style, and urbanicity) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.