Who lives in Pennsylvania?
Pennsylvania · Northeast · 12.96M residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Pennsylvania compares
Where Pennsylvania lands in the 50-state rankings, and the states whose residents most closely match its behavioral profile.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 50 US statesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Cities that break the state pattern
distance from the Pennsylvania norm, 0–100 · ↑ ↓ the trait driving itWho they are
Pennsylvania's defining habit shows up before anyone gets sick. About 48% of residents treat their health preventively, scheduling the screening and managing the condition ahead of time, well above the roughly 41% who do the same nationally. It is a fitting signature for a state whose suburban Philadelphia corridor is thick with health systems and pharmaceutical and life-sciences employers, and whose Pittsburgh side rebuilt itself around hospitals and universities after steel left.
Where the country spreads across cities, suburbs, and countryside, Pennsylvania concentrates in the middle: roughly 68% of residents are suburban, against about 52% nationally, the single clearest fact about how the state is laid out. The age curve tracks the country almost exactly, with a mean near 47. The sharpest difference from the national pattern is religious. Evangelical affiliation runs about 17% here versus roughly 27% across the country, a reminder that the Keystone State's faith life leans more toward older mainline and Catholic traditions than toward the evangelical mainstream.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
How Pennsylvanians decide and how much risk they accept both sit close to the national center, so the useful read is not drama but steadiness. The Big Five personality picture is near baseline across the board, with one small lift: residents carry a touch more day-to-day worry and sensitivity to stress than the typical American, a couple of points above the mean on that measure.
That mild edge of caution rhymes with the preventive streak running through the rest of the profile. It is the temperament of people who would rather handle a problem before it grows than gamble on it sorting itself out, which is worth keeping in mind anywhere a pitch asks them to take something on faith.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 50 US states. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
On values, Pennsylvania looks like the country with the volume turned to normal. Environmental concern, the pull toward local businesses, and willingness to pay for ethical sourcing all sit within a point or two of the national split, so none of these is the lever that moves this audience.
Trust in big institutions is equally middle-of-the-road. Most residents hold companies at a neutral or mildly skeptical distance rather than embracing or rejecting them outright. Earned credibility and plain claims travel further here than either a hard sell or a crusading mission.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reaching Pennsylvania means meeting a broad, suburban audience on mainstream channels rather than niche ones. Facebook is the anchor at roughly 31% of residents, with Instagram and YouTube filling out the middle, and the platform mix barely departs from the national split.
Content appetite is just as balanced. Short video leads narrowly, but long video, mixed formats, and plain text all hold meaningful shares, so no single format unlocks this group. The reliable approach is consistent presence across the big platforms with messaging built for a settled, preventive-minded suburban household.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending here is grounded and a little conservative. Price leads purchase decisions for about a third of residents, with quality close behind, and how often people buy lands right around the national rhythm. The clearest financial tilt is toward caution rather than accumulation: aggressive saving runs a few points below average, near 22%, and more residents than typical describe themselves as non-savers.
That shows up in investing too. Roughly 42% sit out the markets entirely, a bit above the national non-investor share, which fits a household economy that prizes covering the bills and avoiding exposure over chasing returns. Framing that emphasizes value and durability lands better than appeals to upside.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
The preventive instinct carries straight into daily life. Only about 16% of residents are indifferent to their health, below the national share near 21%, and the bulk land in the aware-to-proactive range where people watch what they eat, stay current on checkups, and act before small things turn into big ones.
It is a practical, maintenance-minded relationship with wellbeing rather than an extreme one. The share who treat health as an all-consuming project is actually a bit below average, and openness to talking about mental health tracks the country closely. These are people managing their health like a household they keep in good repair, not a performance.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Pennsylvania (healthcare style, urbanicity, and health consciousness) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.