Who lives in Memphis, Tennessee?
Tennessee · South · 630K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Memphis compares
Where Memphis lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Memphis is a city of about 630,000 people anchored in the far southwest corner of Tennessee, where the Mississippi River meets Arkansas and the Delta. Its defining feature is its racial makeup: roughly 62% of residents are Black, more than four times the national share, the legacy of a city that was a gateway out of the Delta and the cradle of Beale Street and Memphis soul. Faith runs alongside it, with close to 59% identifying as evangelical, well over double the typical rate, so church is a real organizing force in daily life.
The age curve sits near the national middle, a touch younger on average, with a fuller band of residents in their late twenties and early thirties. The harder edge of the picture is economic. This is FedEx's home and a major medical center, yet excellent credit is about half as common here as nationally, near 12%, and the everyday squeeze shows up across how people save, insure, and spend.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
The personality picture is steady with one real tilt. Residents lean a little more conscientious and open than average and sit right at the national mark on sociability, so the temperament is grounded and planful rather than dramatic. The exception is emotional reactivity, which runs several points high, the signature of a population carrying genuine financial and daily strain.
Decision-making moves at roughly the national pace with a slight pull toward deliberation, and risk appetite leans cautious. Both fit households with little cushion to absorb a mistake. People here want to feel sure before they commit, and they respond to calm over pressure.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Memphis residents carry a sharper edge of distrust toward big institutions than the country at large. Far fewer are inclined to take corporations at their word, and the openly cynical share runs nearly double national, a reasonable posture in a city where the gap between corporate headquarters and household budgets is felt directly. Brands earn standing here by being straight, not by being slick.
Ethical and environmental concern actually runs warmer than you might expect. The share who simply do not factor ethics into buying is well below national, and active environmental concern sits above it, so values-based positioning has an audience. The one caution is local-business loyalty, which runs softer than typical: convenience and price tend to win the actual purchase, even among people who care.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach here tracks the mainstream. Facebook and Instagram carry the largest shares, with the usual long tail of YouTube, TikTok, and the rest, and no single platform over-indexes enough to build a plan around alone. Short video is the format that pulls slightly ahead of the pack.
The practical read is that channel matters less than message. This is a value-conscious, faith-anchored, institution-skeptical audience, so creative that is plain-spoken, proves its claims, and respects a tight budget will outperform polish wherever it runs.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
This is where Memphis is loudest. About 46% of residents are non-savers, well over the national rate, and roughly 55% sit outside investing entirely. Minimal insurance coverage runs high too, near 35%, and excellent credit is scarce. Taken together, this is a present-tense household economy where money moves out about as fast as it comes in, and a buffer for the unexpected is the exception rather than the rule.
What people buy still turns on price and quality in roughly national proportions, so the squeeze is about capacity, not taste. Offers built around affordability, transparent cost, and ways to lower the risk of a purchase will travel further than premium or aspirational pitches.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture leans reactive rather than preventive. Proactive and obsessive wellness habits run below national while the indifferent and merely-aware shares run above, the pattern of a city where access and cost shape choices more than aspiration does. The most pointed signal is sleep: residents are far less likely to treat rest as a priority, with the high-priority share down to about 19% against roughly a third nationally, which fits shift work, freight schedules, and the strain showing up elsewhere in the profile.
Openness to talking about mental wellness sits close to the national middle, neither guarded nor especially vocal. Messaging that normalizes support without demanding a public stance fits this audience better than advocacy framing.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Memphis, Tennessee (race ethnicity, savings behavior, and investment style) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.