Who lives in Minnesota?
Minnesota · Midwest · 5.74M residents · Suburban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWhere they live
The state's largest population centers and how its urban-to-rural mix diverges from the national balance.
Urban / rural split
audience % · vs. national baselineLargest cities
by populationWho they are
Minnesota holds about 5.7 million people, and most of them live neither downtown nor out on the land. Roughly 64% are suburban, a built-up ring of Twin Cities communities that carries the state more than any single core does. The Minneapolis-St. Paul metro concentrates one of the densest clusters of large-company headquarters anywhere, from retail and food to medical devices and banking, while Rochester is organized around the Mayo Clinic and the southern counties stay farm country. About 24% of residents are rural, a meaningful share for a state this corporate.
The population skews White at roughly 76%, noticeably broader than the country, and the age curve runs slightly older with a mean near 48. That older, settled, employer-anchored profile sets up almost everything else here: these are households with steady coverage, a savings habit, and the room to think a few years ahead rather than week to week.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Minnesota sits close to the national center on every axis, so the story is not temperament. Where the state separates itself is in how exposed people let themselves be. Financial stress runs low for about 36% of residents, a comfortable cushion that shows up again in their saving and insurance habits.
Decision-making and appetite for risk both track the country almost exactly. People here move at an ordinary pace and take ordinary chances, so neither urgency nor daredevil upside is the wedge that moves them. The lever is reassurance that a choice will hold up, which fits a population that already plans for the downside.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Decision speed tracks the country almost exactly, with the same balance of quick movers and careful deliberators. That flatness rules out manufactured urgency and countdown pressure as a wedge, since nothing about this audience is wired to act fast under a clock. Lead instead with substantiation people can sit with, side-by-side proof and clear terms, which suits a population that already plans before it commits.
Risk appetite sits squarely at the national center, neither bold nor skittish. Read against a state with low financial stress and a strong savings cushion, that evenness means people can absorb a calculated bet but feel no need to chase one. Upside and novelty earn a place only when paired with a floor under the downside, so guarantees and easy reversibility carry the weight that pure ambition would not.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
<p>A touch below the national center. Minnesotans are receptive to a good new idea but not hungry for novelty for its own sake, and the unproven gets a skeptical first look. Lead with what works and has a track record rather than what is merely new, and let the fresh angle ride along as a bonus.</p>
<p>Right at the national center, which lines up with how carefully this state saves and insures. Follow-through and reliability are assumed here, so promises about dependability confirm what people already expect rather than surprising them. Keep commitments concrete and deliverable.</p>
<p>Essentially national. Minnesotans are no more drawn to the spotlight or the crowd than anyone else, so neither loud social proof nor quiet exclusivity is the obvious key. A steady, plainspoken approach travels further than high-energy spectacle.</p>
<p>A hair above the national center. People here lean toward giving others the benefit of the doubt and keeping things cordial, which rewards good-faith framing and a cooperative tone. Sharp, adversarial pitches will read as off-key.</p>
<p>Below the national center, the even-keel reading you would expect from a low-financial-stress population with a cushion under it. People here are harder to rattle, so manufactured alarm falls flat and tends to backfire. Calm, matter-of-fact confidence is the register that lands.</p>
What they care about
On the value questions Minnesota lands near the middle. Environmental concern, ethical buying, and the pull toward local shops all sit within a point or two of typical, so none of them functions as a defining cause. There is a faint lean toward local business, the kind you would expect in a state with strong main streets outside the metro, but it is a tilt rather than a banner.
Trust in big companies also runs near the norm, which matters in a state where so many residents draw a paycheck from a recognizable brand. People here are neither reflexively suspicious of corporations nor especially devoted to them. Straight claims that check out will travel further than appeals to ideology.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Media habits in Minnesota look like the country's. Facebook carries a slightly larger share of primary attention than usual, fitting an older, suburban population, while the rest of the platform mix from Instagram to YouTube to TikTok sits near typical. There is no single channel that unlocks the state.
Format preference is just as even, split across short video, long video, and mixed content with no standout. Reach comes from breadth and from substance, not from chasing one trend. Meet people where they already are and give them something that holds up to a second look.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money here is managed with a long horizon. Only about 21% are non-savers, and roughly 31% save aggressively, a clear surplus of households putting real money away. Insurance follows the same logic: just 13% carry minimal coverage, the most distinctive money signal in the state and a sign people insure against the bad year as a default rather than an afterthought.
Investing reflects the same comfort, with non-investors running a few points below typical. What drives the actual purchase stays plain, mostly price and quality at national rates. These are households that spend deliberately and protect what they have built.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is where Minnesota is loudest. Sleep is treated as a real priority by about 43% of residents, and only around 6% qualify as avoidant about their health, well below the national share of people who skip care until they have to. Proactive health management runs a few points high, with the genuinely indifferent thinner than usual.
Put those together and you get a wellness posture built on staying ahead of problems, a fit for a state whose largest employer is a clinic and whose culture treats the annual checkup as routine. Mental wellness openness sits just above the middle, so candor about health is welcome without being a crusade.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Minnesota (sleep priority, insurance orientation, and race ethnicity) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.