Who lives in Miramar, Florida?
Florida · South · 135K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Miramar compares
Where Miramar lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Miramar is a city of about 135,158 stretched 14 miles east to west across southern Broward County, from the edge of the Everglades to the older blocks near the Miami-Dade line. It grew from a 1950s bedroom community into one of the metro's most diverse cities: only about 19% of residents are White, roughly a third of the national share, with a population anchored by large Jamaican, Haitian, and other Caribbean and Hispanic communities.
The age curve skews toward working and parenting years, with the 35-to-54 bands running several points above national and the 65-plus group thinner than typical. This is a settled-family suburb, not a retirement or student town, and that stage of life shapes much of what follows.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here sits close to the national baseline on most axes, with openness the clearest exception, nudged up by a population that pulls from many cultures rather than one. Conscientiousness leans slightly toward planning, fitting households that chose newer, deliberately built communities.
Decision-making pace is ordinary, but risk appetite runs a little bolder than average. These are people comfortable backing a confident choice, which matters more for how they buy than how fast they decide.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
This is the loudest part of the profile. Ethics show up in purchases far more than the country at large, with only about 16% saying they never matter against roughly 32% nationally, and the strict end running double the national share. Environmental concern follows the same shape: the unconcerned bucket is half its usual size, and the genuinely active and activist groups are noticeably fuller.
Preference for local business runs slightly below national, so the values lean is about how a product is made and what it stands for more than where it is sold. Lead with substance on sourcing and impact, and let it carry real weight.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Instagram over-indexes as a primary platform, running several points above national, while Facebook sits a little below and TikTok edges up. Reach skews visual and mobile, with podcast listening notably more common than typical, since only about 22% tune out audio entirely against a third of the country.
Short video is the strongest content format, in line with the Instagram lean. A campaign built for the feed and the earbuds, carrying a credible values message, meets this audience where it already spends its attention.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
These households buy often. Weekly shoppers run about 30% against roughly 20% nationally, and the rare-buyer group is half its usual size, the rhythm of busy families restocking on a steady cadence. Returns come with that volume: sending items back frequently is about 1.5 times more common here than typical, so a frictionless return process is part of the value, not an afterthought.
Saving is uneven. The sporadic savers outnumber the national rate while steady aggressive saving runs below it, the pattern of a middle-income base balancing mortgages and children against putting money away. Price and quality drive choices in roughly national proportion, so neither bargain-hunting nor premium framing alone will define the pitch.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health is treated as something to manage ahead of trouble. Close to 47% take a proactive posture toward their wellbeing versus about a third nationally, and the indifferent group is less than half its usual size. Spending on wellness follows: the minimal-spend bucket is well below the national rate, so this is an audience that puts money behind the intention.
Openness to mental-wellness conversation sits near typical, neither guarded nor especially vocal. The story here is preventive and practical rather than performative.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Miramar, Florida (ethical consumption level, race ethnicity, and return behavior) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.