Who lives in Oklahoma
Oklahoma · South · 4.05M residents · Rural
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Oklahoma compares
Where Oklahoma lands in the 50-state rankings, and the states whose residents most closely match its behavioral profile.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 50 US statesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Cities that break the state pattern
distance from the Oklahoma norm, 0–100 · ↑ ↓ the trait driving itWho they are
Oklahoma is home to about 4.05 million people, and it stays a rural state at heart. Close to 39% of residents live in rural areas and another roughly 34% in suburbs, so the population that anchors Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Norman, and Broken Arrow is balanced against a wide stretch of small towns and open country. The age curve sits close to the national shape, with a median near 47, and gender splits even.
The defining identity here is faith. Roughly 54% of residents identify as evangelical, about twice the national rate, which places Oklahoma squarely in the Bible Belt and colors how the state reads obligation, charity, and trust. That religious culture sits alongside one of the densest concentrations of Native American tribal nations in the country, and an economy built on oil and gas, aerospace and defense around Tinker Air Force Base, and cattle ranching. The result is a practical, rooted population that tends to handle its own affairs rather than outsource them.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality in Oklahoma sits close to the national center on every Big Five axis, with openness running slightly lower than average and the rest within a point of baseline. The real distance shows up in posture rather than temperament. Decision-making splits between quick deciders and careful deliberators in almost exactly the national proportion, so this is not a place won by speed games.
Risk appetite leans cautious. The high and very-high tolerance buckets run several points under national while the low and very-low ends sit above, which fits a household economy built on thinner savings and a preference for the sure thing over the long shot.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 50 US states. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Values in Oklahoma run pragmatic and unsentimental about consumption. Roughly 48% of residents place no weight on ethical sourcing when they buy, and only a small share shop strictly by it, so fair-trade and conscience-driven labels land softly here. Environmental priority follows the same pattern: about 42% describe themselves as unconcerned, and the activist end is thin.
Where they do show normal feeling is the home street. Preference for local business tracks the national rate almost exactly, and skepticism of corporations sits at the ordinary level. These are buyers who weigh price and quality first and treat virtue messaging as noise.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the workhorse platform, used by roughly 32% of residents and the clearest single entry point into the state, with Instagram and YouTube filling secondary roles. Tech adoption runs cautious, with about 40% in the laggard camp, so newer apps and channels reach a smaller slice than the platform averages suggest.
Content appetite is broad and close to national across text, short video, long video, and audio, which means format matters less than message. Plain, proof-backed messaging on a familiar feed beats novelty for novelty's sake.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending here is steady and unhurried. Purchase frequency tilts toward the occasional and rare end, with weekly buyers running several points below national, which reads as deliberate household budgeting rather than impulse. Price leads the motivation mix at roughly 37%, with quality close behind, and status and ethics barely register.
Saving is the soft spot. About a third are non-savers and the aggressive-saver bucket runs notably below national, leaving many households with a thin cushion. That thin margin is the same reason risk-heavy and premium pitches struggle to land.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
This is the heart of the profile. About 37% of Oklahomans are indifferent to their own health, and close to 30% take an avoidant stance toward care, putting off doctors and checkups until a problem becomes urgent. Wellness spending follows: roughly 40% keep it minimal, and the proactive and obsessive corners of the health spectrum are both underweight.
On mental wellness, Oklahomans are a touch more guarded than average, with about 24% keeping it private. The openness is there in the selective middle, but the loud advocate posture is rare. Reaching this population on health works better through results and routine than through aspiration or alarm.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Oklahoma (health consciousness, healthcare style, and ethical consumption level) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.