Who lives in Richmond, California?
California · West · 116K residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Richmond compares
Where Richmond lands when every US city is ranked on the same behavioral measures, and the cities whose residents most closely mirror its habits, values, and personality.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 865 US citiesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Who they are
Richmond sits on the northeast shore of San Francisco Bay in Contra Costa County, a working port and industrial city of about 115,600 built around the Chevron refinery that Standard Oil planted here in 1901 and the WWII Kaiser shipyards now preserved as the Rosie the Riveter Home Front park. It is a majority-minority city, and that shows in the numbers: only about 19% of residents are White, roughly a third of the national rate, with Latino, Black, and Asian residents making up the rest.
The loudest signal here is conscience in the cart. Just under 14% of residents say company ethics never enter their buying decisions, well below half the national share, and about 17% hold to strict standards, more than double what you would see nationally. Living next door to a refinery that the city has fought in court and at the ballot box for decades tends to make corporate conduct a personal subject rather than an abstract one.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Decision speed and risk appetite both track close to the national shape, so neither manufactured urgency nor heavy guarantees are the natural lever here. On personality, Richmond sits near baseline on most axes. Openness runs a few points above the national mark, the clearest tilt, fitting a diverse city used to new people and new ideas.
Neuroticism reads a touch above national too. This is a renter-heavy, working-class economy where housing costs and an industrial neighbor keep a low background hum of worry running, and messaging that acknowledges real stakes lands better than breezy reassurance.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 865 US cities. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Environmental priority is the second loudest signal and it is nearly the inverse of the country: only about 12% of residents are unconcerned, under half the national share, while more than a third are actively engaged and roughly one in six count as activists. Decades of organizing around the refinery, from air-quality fights to the progressive coalition that has run much of City Hall, have made this a settled civic value rather than a passing mood.
Worth noting where the grain runs the other way: a strong preference for local businesses is actually less common here than nationally, and corporate skepticism sits about average. Richmond judges companies by conduct more than by zip code, so an ethics story travels further than a shop-local one.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Richmond has cut the cord faster than most: about 44% are streaming-only households, above the national rate, so connected-TV and on-demand reach them where traditional broadcast does not. Podcast habits skew toward listeners, with the non-listener share down to roughly 23% against a third nationally, making audio a real channel rather than a long shot.
On social, Facebook indexes a few points below national while Instagram runs ahead, and short video edges out long. The practical read: favor Instagram and short-form over a Facebook-first plan, and treat podcasts and streaming as the backbone of any reach effort here.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Richmond shops often and returns freely. About 31% of residents buy something most weeks, half again the national rate, and the rare-shopper end is thin. Returns are the third loudest signal in the whole profile: roughly 41% send purchases back frequently, well above the national share, so these are buyers who give things a try and reverse the call without much friction.
Savings behavior and purchase motivation both track national, with price and quality leading the reasons people buy. The takeaway is operational more than persuasive: a generous, painless return policy is close to a requirement here, and the cost of a smooth reversal buys repeat business from frequent shoppers.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health consciousness leans proactive. Only about 12% of residents are indifferent to their health, below the national rate, and roughly 41% take an active, ahead-of-problems approach to it. The obsessive end stays modest, so this is steady attention rather than wellness as a hobby.
Openness to talking about mental health sits close to national, neither guarded nor especially vocal. Practical framing around managing health on a busy working schedule fits this city better than aspirational lifestyle imagery.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Richmond, California (ethical consumption level, environmental priority, and return behavior) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.