Who lives in South Dakota
South Dakota · Midwest · 919K residents · Rural
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow South Dakota compares
Where South Dakota lands in the 50-state rankings, and the states whose residents most closely match its behavioral profile.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 50 US statesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Cities that break the state pattern
distance from the South Dakota norm, 0–100 · ↑ ↓ the trait driving itWho they are
South Dakota holds about 919,000 people across a sweep of farm-belt prairie in the east, the Missouri River, and the Black Hills rising out of the west toward Mount Rushmore. Sioux Falls is the one true population center, but it does not define the state: close to half of residents, roughly 50%, live rural, and the urban core holds only about 16%. The population reads about 85% White, well above the national share, with the Native American reservations of the central and western counties making up much of the rest.
The clearest behavioral fingerprint sits in how little weight ethical sourcing carries. About 47% never let ethics into a buying decision, the single most distinctive thing about this audience, and only a small fraction, around 2%, hold to it strictly. The age curve runs slightly older than average, with about 23% past 65, fitting a state where small towns keep their elders and young adults often leave for work.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality here sits close to the national center on most axes, so the story is not a dramatic temperament. Where it moves, it moves toward steadiness: residents register lower on the worry-and- volatility scale and a touch lower on appetite for the novel. Decision speed and risk tolerance both track the country closely, which means urgency and gambles are not the levers that work.
The real distance is in posture toward change rather than mood. This is a population slow to take up new technology, with about 41% in the last wave to adopt anything, and that caution colors how they approach anything unfamiliar. They want a thing proven before they trust it, not because they are anxious, but because they see no reason to rush.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 50 US states. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
Ethics and environmental concern carry less pull here than almost anything else on the profile. Nearly 39% call themselves unconcerned about the environment and only about 3% would describe themselves as activists, while the ethics-in-purchasing posture skews heavily toward never. These are not battlegrounds for a brand to win on in South Dakota.
What does register is a quiet preference for the local. About 19% feel a strong pull toward local businesses and only a small share have no preference at all, which fits a state where the main-street shop and the county co-op are often the practical choice as well as the trusted one. Trust in big corporations sits roughly at the national norm, neither warm nor hostile.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the spine of the social diet here, used by about 35% as their main platform, well ahead of Instagram and TikTok, and around 18% sit on no primary platform at all. That points to reach built on the established and the familiar rather than the newest app.
This is also a light streaming and podcast audience. Cord-cutting runs lower than average at about 23%, so traditional and cable TV still hold real ground, and roughly 44% listen to no podcasts. Long-form video edges ahead of short clips. The channels that work are the ones already in the living room, not the ones chasing the feed.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Spending here is steady rather than busy. Only about 12% buy something most weeks while roughly 22% buy rarely, a slower rhythm than the country keeps, which suits a household economy built around fewer, more considered trips rather than frequent small ones. Price leads the reasons people buy, with quality close behind, and status barely registers.
Saving runs a little lighter at the top: about 22% save aggressively against a quarter nationally, while the non-saver and sporadic shares sit near the norm. People here also send goods back far less often, with frequent returners running about 17%, which points to deliberate purchases that stick rather than buy-and-return churn.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health here leans more hands-off than the country at large. About 28% describe themselves as indifferent to managing their health and only around 4% as obsessive about it, a posture that fits a rural state with long drives to care and a make-do attitude toward wellness. The middle of the curve, the merely aware, holds steady.
Openness to talking through mental wellness runs close to the national pattern, tilting a little more private. Roughly 22% keep that side of life to themselves. Outreach on health and wellbeing lands better framed as practical and low-key than as a lifestyle to opt into.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to South Dakota (ethical consumption level, urbanicity, and tech adoption) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.