Who lives in Montana?
Montana · West · 1.13M residents · Rural
Key signals
vs. national baselineHow Montana compares
Where Montana lands in the 50-state rankings, and the states whose residents most closely match its behavioral profile.
National standings
17 measures · percentile vs. 50 US statesClosest matches
similarity, 0–100Cities that break the state pattern
distance from the Montana norm, 0–100 · ↑ ↓ the trait driving itWho they are
Montana holds about 1.13 million people across an enormous footprint, and the defining fact is how thinly they spread. Roughly 65% live rural, close to four times the national share, while only about 7% sit in anything resembling an urban core. Billings is the largest trade center, and the growth markets of Bozeman, Missoula, and the Flathead sit in the western valleys, but the state's center of gravity stays on the ranchland and grain country of the eastern plains.
The population skews slightly older, with a mean age near 49 and about 24% past 65, and it is heavily white at roughly 88% against a national 57%. That homogeneity, paired with the rural geography, sets up much of what follows: a practical, self-reliant consumer base that has fewer of the dense urban signals (cause campaigns, early-adopter tech culture) that shape buying elsewhere.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
On personality Montana sits close to the national baseline, so the story is small and worth saying plainly rather than dramatizing. The one real dip is emotional volatility, which runs about four points below average: this is a steady, even-keeled audience that does not rattle easily. Openness and extraversion drift a touch below center, conscientiousness and warmth land essentially at the mean.
Decision-making mirrors the country almost exactly. Montanans split between quick and deliberate buyers in roughly national proportions, and risk appetite leans only slightly cautious. The behavior that separates them is not how fast they decide but what they decide on, where novelty and cause carry little weight.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Percentile position vs. 50 US states. ● = this audience; center line = national median.
What they care about
This is where Montana speaks loudest. Cause-based consumption is minimal: about 51% report no ethical filter on what they buy, well above the national third, and the strict end nearly empties out. The same pattern holds on the environment, where roughly 42% land in the unconcerned bracket and the activist share is small. Pitches built on mission, sustainability, or doing-the-right-thing tend to slide off.
Loyalty runs local instead. A solid 21% hold a strong preference for local business, above national, fitting a place where the nearest shop, feed store, or outfitter is part of a small community. Corporate trust sits near the middle, neither warm nor hostile, so brands earn their place on usefulness rather than on values signaling.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Facebook is the front door. It is the primary platform for about 35% of residents, above national, while Instagram and TikTok run lighter and LinkedIn is thin. A meaningful slice, near 19%, name no primary platform at all, so any plan that assumes everyone is reachable on social will miss part of the state.
On format, longer video over-indexes a little and short-form runs below national, and podcast reach is softer, with about 46% listening to none. Streaming skews toward households that keep a traditional pay-TV bundle rather than cutting the cord, so broadcast and cable still carry weight that they have lost in denser markets.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Montanans buy less often and more deliberately. Weekly shopping drops to about 9% against a national 19%, and the rare-purchase bracket nearly doubles to 24%, the rhythm of households that drive distances to town and stock up rather than browse. Price leads purchase motivation, with quality close behind, and status barely figures.
Savings tilt toward the modest middle: the aggressive-saver share runs a bit below national while sporadic and regular saving cover most households. They also return what they buy far less, with frequent returners at about 14% versus 26% nationally, a sign of considered, keep-it purchasing rather than try-and-send-back behavior.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Health posture is grounded and unfussy. About 42% describe themselves as aware of their health without making a project of it, while the obsessive, optimize-everything end runs below national at under 5%. Openness about mental wellness tracks the country closely, leaning a little more private, consistent with a self-reliant rural temperament rather than any sharp reticence.
The outdoors does a lot of quiet work here. In a state where recreation is a real slice of the economy and the mountains and rangeland are the front yard, wellness reads less as a wellness-industry purchase and more as a way of living, which is part of why the proactive-buyer bracket runs lighter than average.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Montana (urbanicity, ethical consumption level, and environmental priority) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.