Who lives in Texas?
Texas · South · 30.50M residents · Urban
Key signals
vs. national baselineWhere they live
The state's largest population centers and how its urban-to-rural mix diverges from the national balance.
Urban / rural split
audience % · vs. national baselineWho they are
Texas is home to about 30.5 million people, and the way they handle their health is the trait that sets them apart most sharply. Roughly 33% sit in the avoidant category for health care, meaning they put off care and stay clear of the system until something forces the issue, against about 13% nationally. That tracks with a state that carries the highest uninsured rate in the country, where seeing a doctor is often a cost decision before it is a health one. The same instinct shows in insurance more broadly: about 30% keep their coverage minimal, well above the national 21%.
The demographic backdrop is a Hispanic plurality near 37%, roughly double the national share, concentrated heaviest along the border and the South Texas corridor but woven through every metro. The age curve runs a touch younger than the country, with a mean near 46 and a slightly thinner 65-and-up band, which fits a state still pulling in working-age newcomers to its energy, logistics, and semiconductor jobs.
Gender split
vs. national baselineAge distribution
audience % · vs. national baselineHow they think
Personality across Texas sits almost exactly at the national center. Openness, conscientiousness, how outgoing people are, warmth toward others, and emotional steadiness all land within a point of baseline, so there is no broad temperamental tilt to lean on. The distance in this audience is behavioral, not dispositional: it lives in how they treat health, coverage, and privacy, not in who they are wired to be.
Decision speed and appetite for risk also hold near the middle. Texans are neither unusually quick to commit nor unusually cautious, which means the levers that move them are practical rather than psychological. Read the profile through what they do under cost pressure, not through a personality edge.
Decision psychology
audience % · vs. national baselineDecision speed
Texans make up their minds at roughly the national pace, splitting evenly between quick movers and careful deliberators with no real tilt either way. That flatness rules out manufactured urgency and ticking-clock scarcity as the lever, since neither a rush instinct nor analysis-paralysis dominates. Lead instead with substantiation: clear pricing, side-by-side proof, and a straight answer to "what does this cost and what do I get." Given how cost-conscious this audience runs on health and coverage, the deciding factor is evidence, not pressure.
Appetite for risk in Texas sits squarely in the middle, with the cautious and the bold buckets both landing close to national. There is no statewide thrill-seeking streak to court and no blanket aversion to soothe. Read against the thin-coverage, cost-first posture elsewhere in the profile, the safer read is to earn trust before asking for a leap: lead with guarantees and easy reversals, and save upside-and-novelty framing for moments where the payoff is concrete and the downside is visibly capped.
Risk tolerance
Personality fingerprint
Big Five (OCEAN) · 0–50–100 scaleAudience score on each Big Five axis. Dashed outline = national average.
Right at the national line on appetite for the new. Texans split between curiosity and convention the same way the country does, so neither a novelty pitch nor a heritage pitch has a built-in edge. Let the product, not a bet on adventurousness, decide which to lead with.
Around the national center on planning and follow-through. This is a get-it-done audience without a strong tilt either way, so neither elaborate process language nor breezy improvisation feels native. Clear terms and a straight answer on price fit the cost-first instinct better.
At the national mark on outward social energy. Texans are no more crowd-driven than the average American, so loud event-and-buzz framing wins nothing extra here. Pitch to the individual making a practical call rather than to a room.
Even with the country on warmth and good faith toward strangers, though it runs alongside a sharper wariness of large institutions. Plain, fair-dealing framing lands well, as long as it does not read as a big company performing friendliness.
At the national baseline on day-to-day reactivity. This is not an easily rattled crowd, so fear-first pitches and urgency built on worry read as off-key. Calm, matter-of-fact delivery fits the temperament better.
What they care about
On the values that drive consumer choices, Texas reads close to the national grain. Environmental priority, support for local independents, and willingness to pay up for ethical sourcing all sit within a point or two of average, so none of these is a reliable wedge across the state as a whole. Price leads purchase motivation here at about 35%, the same weight it carries nationally, with quality second.
Skepticism toward big corporations runs a hair past baseline, with the cynical end slightly fuller than typical. That fits a state whose economy is built on large energy and tech employers yet whose civic temperament prizes self-reliance. Messages that respect that independence land better than ones that ask for institutional faith.
Environmental priority
how much they prioritize sustainability when buying
Corporate skepticism
distrust of big-company motives and messaging
Local business preference
bias toward small/local over national chains
Ethical consumption
whether they actually act on ethical buying preferences
How to reach them
Reach across Texas runs through the same channels as the rest of the country, with no platform breaking from the national mix. Facebook anchors the audience near 29%, Instagram sits a bit above average, and TikTok runs slightly fuller than typical, a small skew that fits the younger-leaning age curve. Short video is the leading format, edging out long video.
Influencer recommendations land a little harder here than nationally, with about 24% inclined to trust them. Paired with the privacy around health and the cost-first mindset, the opening is creator-led, plainspoken content that demonstrates value and price up front rather than polished institutional advertising.
Where attention lives
social platformFormat mix
content formatHow they spend
Money behavior in Texas is close to the national pattern in most respects. Saving habits, how often people buy, and what motivates a purchase all track the country, with price doing the heavy lifting and quality close behind. There is no aggressive-saver surge or spending spree here to design around at the state level.
The one financial signal that connects to the rest of the profile is the minimal-insurance lean, where about 30% carry only thin coverage. Households running without much of a safety net tend to weigh near-term cost over long-horizon protection, so warranties, guarantees, and clear out-the-door pricing carry more weight than promises that pay off years from now.
Purchase motivation
Purchase frequency
Savings behavior
How they live
Lifestyle is where the health story deepens. Beyond the avoidant care posture, about 24% of Texans treat their own health with indifference, somewhat above the national share, and high sleep priority runs a few points light. This is a population that does not organize daily life around wellness routines, and a meaningful slice keeps the medical system at a distance even when something is wrong.
Texans are also more private about mental wellness, with roughly a quarter keeping that part of life closed off versus about 19% nationally. Outreach on health or emotional well-being works best when it is low-friction, discreet, and framed around cost and control rather than disclosure or lifestyle overhaul.
Health consciousness
audience % · vs. national baselineMental wellness openness
audience % · vs. national baselineHow this profile was built
This profile draws on a population of 10M+ statistically modeled U.S. adults, calibrated against Census ACS data, BLS employment statistics, CDC BRFSS (N>400K), and peer-reviewed personality and consumer research. The traits most distinctive to Texas (healthcare style, insurance orientation, and race ethnicity) are primarily derived from the peer-reviewed and federal sources listed below.
References
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey — Demographic Tables (B01001, B15003, B19001, B23025, C24050)
- 2.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics / Current Employment Statistics
- 3.Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024). Consumer Expenditure Surveys
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (N=400,000)
- 5.Pew Research Center (2016). Technology Adoption by Baby Boomers (and Everybody Else) (N=1,520)
Need these insights for your own audiences?
Get full distributions on every audience in the library plus custom audience queries with your own filters.